User talk:DrGonzalezRojas

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Extract of GreenNews.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Extract of GreenNews.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 13:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:NunheadKnocksEdit.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NunheadKnocksEdit.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Harriet Harman, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 00:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't upload any more photos or imnages that you find on the Internet. Photos that you find online are copyright, and we are not allowed to display them on Wikipedia. You should only upload photos that you have taken yourself. I have deleted some of your uploads on this basis.— Diannaa (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:GreenNewsNunv2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:GreenNewsNunv2.jpg, which you've attributed to Catherine Dawkins. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to File:NunheadKnocksEdit.jpg and File:GreenNewsNun.jpg — Diannaa (talk) 00:38, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claire Sheppard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claire Sheppard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Sheppard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The politics bits could be removed, but she is still a notable woman campaigner, meeting the criteria for significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject mainly due to her work of Nunhead Knocks, and even after covid she is still mentioned in letters sent to Southwark residents in different topics such as mental health : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1teuJJrry9VAopE1xMEUtZnkFMf8x7Y0f/edi DrGonzalezRojas (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pete Elliott (UK politican) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Elliott (UK politican) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Elliott (UK politican) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PerpetuityGrat (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The politics bits could be removed, but she is still a notable woman campaigner, meeting the criteria for significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject mainly due to her work of Nunhead Knocks, and even after covid she is still mentioned in letters sent to Southwark residents in different topics such as mental health : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1teuJJrry9VAopE1xMEUtZnkFMf8x7Y0f/edit DrGonzalezRojas (talk) 23:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore last message, I'm still very unused to Wikipedia! DrGonzalezRojas (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For PETE ELLIOTT

I thought elected local councillors, particularly those that had been in the news a couple time, qualified for having a wikipedia article. Particularly after I raised this example of a local politician without any mention in the media for deletion and I got told it "clearly" was notable : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marina_Ahmad

I look forward to your answer. DrGonzalezRojas (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, DrGonzalezRojas. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It appears that you are a member of the Southwark Green Party. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 15:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you PerpetuityGrat, I came here to post the same message. In addition to all of the Green Party edits, this account's attempts to delete the article of Labour politician Marina Ahmad is quite dubious. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrsSnoozyTurtle and PerpetuityGrat

I appreciate your concerns about a conflict of interest, to which I would like to point out the more than 30 000 bytes of information I have added about other politicians and parties, ranging from Boris Johnson to Richard Tice to local parties of the Canary Islands or the Barcelona City Council!

I am a nerd so I look forward to writing more articles about politicians, insofar the only ones without an article or enough depth in their pages were Green Party politicians.

Thanks. DrGonzalezRojas (talk) 00:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response and your contributions to the various articles. Just to clarify, do you have any association with the Green Party? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:17, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

No I do not, I am affiliated to Coalicion Canaria (Canarian Coalition in Spain), I just work in the UK atm and where I live I get a lot of leaflets from the Green Party featuring some of the candidates I've written about;since I was able to find more information about them on Google.

E.g councillor Labour Leo Pollak's only featuring of the news is when he resigned.

Thanks. DrGonzalezRojas (talk) 09:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DrGonzalezRojas, that's great to hear. Happy editing! Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]