User talk:DrAgubua

Welcome!

Hello, DrAgubua, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like My Tarnished Reputation, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 18:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of My Tarnished Reputation

A tag has been placed on My Tarnished Reputation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 18:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with My Tarnished Reputation. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with My Tarnished Reputation. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RadioFan (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it once. It was put back and I left it alone.--DrAgubua (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with My Tarnished Reputation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A hangon tag is in place. Explain why the article should be kept on the talk page, but don't delete the speedy deletion tag. —C.Fred (talk) 18:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

137.148.217.254

If you wish to change your userid, that can be done, but please do not log out to edit article such as My Tarnished Reputation, especially to remove speedy deletion tags.--RadioFan (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't. Shut up. Or I will have your account blocked for harassing me. I think it's called user-stalking.--DrAgubua (talk) 18:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:RadioFan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RadioFan (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest that you not claim to be an administrator when you are not one, as you did here. —C.Fred (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:C.Fred, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RadioFan (talk) 18:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 19:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DrAgubua for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. RadioFan (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrAgubua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ridiculous. Why am I blocked? I created an article and someone started harassing me, claiming it was a hoax. That's ridiculous, considering I am listening to the CD as I type this.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for persistent disruption of the article by removing valid speedy deletion tags and for harassment of multiple users. —C.Fred (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As for your comment about the CD, I agree that the article was not a hoax. However, just because a band/album/etc. exists does not mean it is notable. The article was deleted because the artist is not a notable artist, and articles about albums by non-notable bands are subject to speedy deletion under criterion A9. —C.Fred (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the hoax tag was added because the claims of Billboard ranking are not corroborated on the Billboard website. A band with a song that has charted is going to show up in their database, this one doesn't. if it quacks like a duck.... --RadioFan (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you do not desire to civilly discuss why you were blocked, you've lost the privileges of editing this talk page, as well as any other page on Wikipedia, for 48 hours. —C.Fred (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]