User talk:Dr. Tariq Nayfeh

April 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Physician. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Long term edit wars can also be reported to administrators and may result in blocks. Please justify your edits on the talk page, and try to form a consensus for them. I will discuss it with you there after you give your reasoning. Please don't just ignore this. Verbal chat 19:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please justify it on the talk page, don't just revert! WP:BRD, WP:BURDEN Verbal chat 19:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Piriformis syndrome, you will be blocked from editing. CardinalDan (talk) 20:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Piriformis syndrome. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Osteotomy. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Dawn Bard (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy 96 20:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate accounts

Use of alternate accounts to cause disruption is forbidden. Future use of alternate accounts to bypass a block or game a debate will result in this account being blocked indef. See our multiple account policy for further information. —— nix eagle^{email me} 02:07, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And per evidence that you have, in fact, created numerous edit-warring socks, you are blocked indefinitely. Blueboy 96 12:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sogsw for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Verbal chat 19:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr. Tariq Nayfeh for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Verbal chat 15:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]