User talk:Dr. Pizza

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. RexNL 14:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy!

Welcome!

Hello, Dr. Pizza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Thanks for the help on the Dreams So Real article. I've used some of the images you've uploaded on the album articles, because I couldn't find good ones, so thanks. Perhaps you have tracklistings for Father's House and Nocturnal Omissions around? A quick note, though, if you upload album covers, be sure to tag them with {{albumcover}} so they don't get deleted. Also, keep album covers on album pages, because using them in the main article may be a fair use violation. Good luck! --badlydrawnjeff talk 22:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thank you for the cleanup on my page

Re: your message: No problem! Glad to help. - Tapir Terrific 23:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:P03881wh137.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:P03881wh137.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wtf?

keep your pesonal life to your self, your page is depressing and goes against everything wikipedia stands for. Delete it. also wrestling is stupid, and keep your gaybashing to yourself you bigoted basterd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.193.20.19 (talk)

-Leave a signature next time. I really don't care what you think, they are my opinions.--Dr. Pizza 06:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability vs. importance

No one's suggesting that you're not important. Notability standards on Wikipedia are there for your protection as well as for the betterment of the site. Without proper attribution, we have no way of verifying if biographical data is true, a situation that both compromises the site and has the potential for libelling people. Your article was marked for speedy deletion because, in my estimation, it clearly has no chance of gaining attribution, unless you do something in the future that does gain attention from reputable media sources (in the meantime, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball). This is one of the core tenets of wikipedia. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with the 5 pillars of Wikipedia, and happy editing. Feeeshboy 07:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dreamssoreal.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dreamssoreal.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dreams So Real - Rough Night In Jericho.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dreams So Real - Rough Night In Jericho.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dreams So Real - Nocturnal Omissions med.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dreams So Real - Nocturnal Omissions med.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted pictures with out Fair use rationale

dear Dr. Pizza
I take the liberty to asnwer the question you posted on BetaCommands user page. Your images has been tagged by a bot because they are tagged to be images with copyright. A bot does not have the ability to delete images from wikipedia, only an administrator does. The tags mean that your images wil go through a review by an administrator to see if there is Fair use explantion on the page.
This means you need to go the page and ad a fair use rationale to the pictures. Please do not remove the notice posted by the bot, the reviewing admin will do it.
Please see this picture Image:BizarreRideIIthePharcyde.jpg for an album cover with proper fair use rationale. You can besides the fair use rationale also add the following text.
This images was uploaded by Dr. Pizza (Talkpage), for questions about this image please go to my talk page.
I hope this answers your questiosn, and beware this reply is not endorsed by BetaCommand, or anybody else.
Best regards and happy edinting. Mads Angelbo ^{Talk / Contribs} 11:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: WP:BLP violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mark Copani, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Burntsauce 20:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT adoption warning

Comments like this one are neither constructive nor appropriate. Remember to remain WP:CIVIL. Fireplace 03:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Delta College (Michigan) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 18:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Delta College (Michigan) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 18:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Dreams So Real

Hi Dr. Pizza,

Regarding the commentary you left on my User page. It appears you have mis-interpreted my edit comment. At the time, I actually thought you were a member of the band (After re-reading your edit comment just now, I see that is not the case). So, my point was that everyone needs to follow the wikipedia guidelines about only including encyclopedic content - even if the subject of the article is the editor. By no means did I mean to suggest that you were a "nobody" as you stated.

If you reply, please do so on my talk page at User talk:Roswell native rather than my User page as you did previously, and please sign your comments. I am going to move your previous statement to my talk page as well.

Finally, please remember Wikipedia:Civility is a policy (a widely accepted standard that all users should follow). I assumed good faith in your edit; however, I did think it was non-encyclopedic and didn't belong in the article so I removed it. I meant no ill-will towards you and hope you continue to improve the band's article with the Wikipedia content guidelines in mind. Regards. --Roswell native (talk) 00:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPA

With regard to your comments on Talk:Sean Bell: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Queerbubbles | ^{Leave me Some Love} 18:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:002544.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:002544.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to John Cena has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the message you recently left to User talk:24.59.0.73. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. While the original edit by this user was vandalism and I have rolled it back, please use proper warnings when reverting/informing about it Kgasso (talk) 06:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Dreams So Real has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JCutter (talk) 23:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dreams So Real, you will be blocked from editing. Vianello (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Dreams So Real. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Erik9 (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 98.248.32.44 (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuits?

This section has WP:NOTAFORUM issues at Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica, so it is archived here.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 11:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At least one of my online associates has been victimized byt ED & has threatened legal action. These guys posted up nude photos of him & his art without his permission. They also say slanderous untrue things about web selebrities. There's no way this place hasn't been under a constant barage of legal action like Pirate Bay.

I waould also suggest replacing "satirical" with "Troll." These guys are just as bad as the lowlifes from 4Chan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 (talk) 23:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ED is ran by "Channers". It's the same crowed. In any case, we aren't going to use internet slang in describing a website. The website is accurately described as satirical. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously want to take them to court for the damages they have done to me. Does anyone know what i can do to do something about this?--Dr. Pizza (talk) 10:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this to do with EDiots saying bad things about your cat, or something? - Alison ^❤ 10:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My free advice (bearing in mind that I am not a lawyer) is to get over it. Little good ever came out of web-related lawsuits, and you could waste a load of money.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is getting banned infinitely from Encyclopedia Dramatica a part of your legal strategy? If anything, your ED vandalism has only made things worse. I recommend that you simply ignore them. Legal action will just cause more stress for you in the long run. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to ECW (WWE), even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 22:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the hidden warning (that you deleted) said, the guideline of WP:TV is to use "is" for a TV show, even for TV shows that ended 40 years ago. TJ Spyke 01:43, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Always Thought I'd See You Again

I've removed your speedy delete tag from this article as we have an article on the artist (Tiffany (singer)) and so was ineligible for a A9 speedy. The WP:CSD#A9 clearly states that it applies only to articles "where the artist's article does not exist". Please be more careful with your tagging in future. As the single is clearly not notable I've redirected the page. Dpmuk (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Winnipeg NHL Team

Under what criteria did you speedy delete the article Winnipeg NHL Team. This deletion was executed without prior notification, discussion, or opportunity to challenge such deletion. I have read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, but I cannot find any criteria that allows an administrator to unilaterally speedy delete a well-referenced article about a subject which meets the General notability guidelines. Dolovis (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The below reply by Dr. Pizza, place on Dolovis' talk page here has been moved to Dr. Pizza's talk page where the discussion was started:

I don't know how major Wikipedia edits work, but I knew in general that there is no Winnipeg team yet. Thats all. It wasn't anything against you. :) But If it wasn't me, someone else would have. So i apologize for coming off like a newbie. But this place goes by facts, not speculation. And that was my own Criteria that i went by.--Dr. Pizza (talk) 13:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Winnipeg NHL Team

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Winnipeg NHL Team. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Dolovis (talk) 14:43, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't vandalism

Setting up the realignment box for the NHL as it will be in 2012. --FourteenClowns (talk) 15:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who made you king of this fair land. Not vandalism -> [1] --FourteenClowns (talk) 01:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't contact you anymore. What if I'm about to eat day old pizza? What is the best way to get it back to almost original shape? I'd be lost without you! --FourteenClowns (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Winnipeg Jets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NHLPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hello, I'm Dree12. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Donald Fehr because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dree12 (talk) 22:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Fehr, you may be blocked from editing. PM800 (talk) 22:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Cinderella (sports)

I've just see your edit to Cinderella (sports), I don't think the section on the LA Kings was removed because they weren't believed to be a "Cinderella" team. I think it was removed as part of a generally trimming of the article. The article only lists examples of "Cinderella" teams, given the somewhat subjective nature of what constitutes a "Cinderella" team an encyclopaedia can never hope to lists all "Cinderella" teams. There was an excessive number of teams listed, so a decision was made to cut the number of teams down to 1 or 2 teams, and remove the rest. The decision was taken to remove teams/paragraphs that did not have multiple independant sources citing the team as a "Cinderella" team. There's no an ongoing effort to stop new teams being added unless the references would support replacing an exist team. Rehnn83 ^Talk 10:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit to Cinderella (sports)

I've reverted your edit of adding Minnesota North Stars to the list of examples on Cinderella (sports). This items on this list are only examples. Due to the subjective nature of the topic, it can't possibly cover every case of a potential Cinderella team and there are already a number of Ice Hockey examples listed. Rehnn83 ^Talk 10:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dr. Pizza. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dr. Pizza. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dr. Pizza. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dr. Pizza. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]