User talk:Dr. Hud

Welcome!

Hello, Dr. Hud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:43, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

History of Japan

You should know that reverting another user's edits without an explanation is generally considered extremely poor form, especially when they provided an explanation for their edits. I would implore you to self-revert, and take your proposed article changes to the talk page. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Empire of Japan into History of Japan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa: you probably want to look at the section above yours—there are problems with the inclusion of the material itself, and it's been removed once, only to be reinstated by Dr. Hud without explanation. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 02:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but I decided not to get involved in that aspect. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware it was copied from an article on a sub-topic. This supports my assertion that it was WP:UNDUE to begin with (an assertion that, full disclosure, CT made to me first, by email; almost all of my Wikipedia activity recently has been reactionary, and I didn't notice the edit until I was emailed). Copying an entire section verbatim from Empire of Japan onto the broader History of Japan article (as opposed to, say, the Christianity in Japan article) couldn't possibly be appropriate even if it was attributed. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Caste— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]