User talk:Dr. Hannibal Lecter
|
== Original research ==
There have been at least three Wiki users (myself, CyberGhostFace and Gdo01) that have objected to your original research and/or speculation.
Your future as a Wikipedia contributor isn't going to be a very long one if you can't learn the rules and abide by them.GuruAskew 01:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism on Hannibal Lector page
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Hannibal Lector, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
My apologies. Upon futher review of the former warning a glitch in wikipedia caused me to see Hannibal Lector is a "real person" that was simply because Wikipedia somehow reverted the page to the former by itself. That happens sometimes. Sorry. You did not vandalize. 204.52.215.128 20:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Don't try to pass your POV edits off on anonymous IP's
[edit]Here is the statement that YOU added to the "Red Dragon (film)" page that I objected to and removed:
"and actually more accurate in many respects than Red Dragon'"
That statement is clearly and undeniably POV and can definitively be attributed to you via your 00:03 January 30 2007 edit.
The first part of the quote that I edited was from an anonymous IP (71.243.141.131) but your elaboration on said comment was every bit as POV and subsequently my edit was valid. Once again I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the difference between fact and opinion.GuruAskew 04:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Please research before editing
[edit]In the article Manhunter you wrote "The film has a 94% rating of "Fresh" on Rotten Tomatoes one away from a "Certified Fresh" rating, for which a 95% is needed". This is not true.
"Rotten Tomatoes awards the Certified Fresh accolade to theater releases reviewed by 40 or more critics (including 5 critics from the Cream of the Crop) that score at least 75% or higher on the Tomatometer. A film remains Certified Fresh unless its Tomatometer falls below 60%"
Manhunter didnt get Certified because there were not enough critics. Please research next time. 204.52.215.128 20:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Not a problem, btw I apologize for the early misunderstanding with vandalism see above. 204.52.215.128 20:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
With apologies, I've removed your warning; the user already had been blocked for the activity you noted. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 14:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Manhunter
[edit]Hannibal is called 'Lecktor' not 'Lecter' and he was a serial killer who preyed on women specifically in that film.--CyberGhostface 22:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Regarding your question about Ulliel--in this interview he states "Obviously I knew that the audience would expect some similarities with Anthony Hopkins so one part of my preparation for the role was to observe Anthony Hopkins and pick a few details and mix it with my own character. So yes, I tried to pick a few subtle details in his performance." Thats the only one I can find now, but he has made numerous references in other interviews to watching Silence of the Lambs again and again to catch up on Hopkins's mannerisms. Hope that helps.--CyberGhostface 18:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Aaron THomas
[edit]Someone nominated this for deletion. I chipped in; you might want to as well...--CyberGhostface 17:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hannibal
[edit]Hey man, I just put a load of good stuff in there. That ariticle was a piece of crap before, ive tried to build it up. I put the important trivia stuff in the article itself,. Why have you reverted it so far back, all the good images have gone? That was all godd stuff, not perfect.
Hannibal
[edit]I didnt actually take much away- "Plot" is intact, so is "differences from the novel", I moved the box office and reactoin stuff to the bottom where it should be, took the trive section out. You seem to have reverted it way to back, so it has mistakes in now. What was wrong with the images of the concept sketch of verger? Or the title image? Trivia doesnt belong in good articles, so what? Whataboutbob 00:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Hannibal
[edit]Well, if I just try to explain in a logical way.
The whole article has been classed as a “start” for a long time. That is a long way from FA article status. Because im a big fan of the film, and Ridley Scott I’ve done a huge amount of research into the film – which I’ve tried to cover an “encyclopaedic “ overview. From background information –too promotion of the film.
There are some very interesting developments which happened in getting this film made – which had a direct impact on what it became, ive tried to document this with an obvious view of further help and contribution by anybody, that’s what its all about.
I appreciate what you say about the length, and I should point out what I added was far from perfect and could certainly do with polish/deletion etc from anybody who sees fit and it was something I was going to work on. I thought it was important to get up what I had and go from there.
Also, the headings are laid out in such a way that it’s easy to dip in and out of what you want. The contents allow this - you don’t have to read it al, there is structure there, as I’ve used some of the better articles as guidance.
Can you please revert the article back slightly? I actually began to amend mistakes, and had added some useful images which gave depth to the article. Do you not think these relevant? I don’t know if you did this because some sections I moved – and placed at the bottom, as this would seem logical. Is it not an article about the film “Hannibal” rather than “Differences from the novel?” I agree, it is an important and interesting section that of course should remain, but like “box-office and reaction” (a section a made a mile better than it was a while ago) should also follow the logical flow – coming after “production and post production” to the films eventual release.
This is a “start” article!!!! It didn’t even have any references in until I put some in a while back, and nobody seemed bother to improve this article. Whataboutbob 12:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Ive put the article back to how it was before you took all the images out etc, but ive but the articles (original) back where they were for now, so this might please you a bit. I took TWO BITS of trivia out which i included in the main article. As I've read so many times, if its trivial - it doesnt belong, if its important - into the main body.
Im not suggestion what I started and put up up is perfect or far from finished. Its work in progress. But a good one at that!Whataboutbob 12:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Georgia WikiProject
[edit]Please check out the discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Georgia_.28country.29 Chris 03:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Possible alterations on the Hannibal Lecter article
[edit]Hey Dr. Hannibal Lecter! I am thinking about major alterations to the Hannibal Lecter article, I just want to know what you think about this. I detailed explanation of what I feel that we should do is in the Hannibal Lecter talk page. Thanks for your help! --Majinvegeta 14:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia New York Meet-Up
[edit]Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC --David Shankbone 22:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Hannibal Lecter
[edit]I don't know if he is or not. I can't remember, I just don't like the title "killing spree". It sounds too simple. I'm actually formerly known as Majinvegeta by the way, I had to change my name due to issues logging in. --VorangorTheDemon 07:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- I saw your user boxes, I stole a few in case you don't mind. :) --VorangorTheDemon 19:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Very interesting User-name, Doc. I've seen the movies Silence of the lambs & Red Dragon; very chilling. GoodDay (talk) 16:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Would you be interested in joining the Wikipedia Crime Project?
[edit]I have seen that you like to contribute to serial killer articles I am trying to organize a task force on this subject under Wikipedia:WikiProject Criminal Biography. If you would be interested in joining contact me. Thanks, Jmm6f488 20:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
P.S. having Hannibal Lecture on our task force would be a real boost
| Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board.
Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing! You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 22:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC) |
 |
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
[edit]
I noticed that you are part of Category:Wikipedians against notability.
I would like to invite you to join the Article Rescue Squadron. Although Rescue Squadron members do not share any official position on notability, and are simply focused on rescuing articles for deletion, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.
Caveat: I am writing this as an individual, not as a representative of Article Rescue Squadron. Ikip (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Tags
[edit]I apologize for any irritation or inconvenience this may cause to you, but I was just wondering - did I just overlook the "This user likes user tags"-tag on your user-page, or is it really missing? :) Best Regards, --G-41614 (talk) 08:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Question on Yuya
[edit]I liked the last version of your edit wrt the Sweeney article. My only question is about the very last sentence. That reads like an afterthought and to be totally honest, I don't even know what that sentence means or how that relates to the rest of the paragraph. --AnnekeBart (talk) 13:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
[edit]
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!