User talk:Dr.Yogesh.Malhotra

'Welcome!' (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Dr.Yogesh.Malhotra, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Ann Stouter 01:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Knowledge Management, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Jauerback 21:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Knowledge Management. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jauerback (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to reinforce the above comments. further disruption may well lead to a temporary loss of editing privileges. But what you may now do appropriately is strikeout any of your own comments there you may wish to retract according to Jauerback's instructions on the talk page, not by deleting them. DGG (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BRINT Institute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BRINT Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BRINT Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 01:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]