User talk:Dr.RonaldLett
You need to review our guidelines on the use of sources in medical articles. We do not ascribe to the notion of false balance and the rules are quite strict regarding what can and should be cited. Primary sources are not equivalent to secondary sources (review articles), this is very, very clear. In particular, Cochrane reviews are seen as among the highest quality publications and carry far more weight than any single experimental trial. We rely on sources to settle disputes, not editors' preferences. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 22:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- If you are going to continue arguing for inclusion of material on specific pages, you should be making your arguments on the specific talk page rather than appealing directly to a single editor. Page contents are developed and maintained, in compliance with the policies and guidelines, through consensus and discussion with as many editors as possible. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 19:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Massage. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.
In particular the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elvey (talk) 09:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)