User talk:Dr.MK

Welcome!

Hello, Dr.MK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Baristarim 03:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, the huns are not european at all! They came from the far far east of Asia... The pronunciation of HUN is just the same like HAN, which means HAN tribe, the tribe of people who had inhabitated in northern part of Korean peninsula and in Korean inland.

One of the legacies from old tomb in Silla dynasty from Kyungjoo, South Korea is very peculiar in that many sculptures of riding horse has "Bronze" pan in their rear! Such ones are also found in many tombs in the huns traces in central Asia and Manjuria.

Moreover, Silla Kings' head shapes are very similar to the ones of the huns leaders'. So-called PYUN'DOO(in their forehead backward whereas the top heads are highly shaped consummated).

The Romans recorded about the barbarous huns; their eyes are small and sharp, their nose are a bit lower, their cheek bones high and their faces round, which means the HUNs were the far east Asians.

The HUNs were experts arrow-shooting on horse ridings; these huntings cannot be seen in any other tribes'. Some of tomb paintings in North Korean region show such horse riding men aiming backward with their peculiar arrows.

So, we can cautiously infer that the huns are the ancestries of asian people around Korean peninsula. The huns didn't have their letters so they borrow Chinese letters until they fablicated HAN'GEUL(the letters of HAN).

So, the HUNs are ancient Korean, not European.

Huns

Please see WP:NOR. Stop posting your own personal theories on Talk pages. CRCulver 11:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop. If you continue to use Talk pages as general discussion forums and post your own personal theories, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. CRCulver 12:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removals

Hi. I noticed your post on Talk:Huns. Let me make it clear that removal of the post of other users is highly frowned upon, except in a few cases: when they include personal attacks or constitute extreme flooding of the talk page. Comments have to be about improvements that can be made to that article, otherwise they can be taken down - but this is a pretty large rule in the sense that the post must be completely off-topic for it to be taken down (like someone talking about what happened to him while driving to work etc). Even for personal attacks, the correct thing would be to remove only the concerned comment and replace it with {{RPA}} (personal attack removed) template.

I had a talk with User:Crculver about this as well. But also remember that this is not a carte blanche for any sort of discussion in the talk pages. They are there to discuss the improvements that can be made to that article. So they are not simple forums: that's what makes Wikipedia different from many web-sites because it is an encyclopedia and not a simple website with a forum page. I restored your posts (repeatedly actually :)) since they seemed to be about the article all throughout.

Since you are a new user, I hope that it hasn't put you off from editing wikipedia! It is very rare that other users start taking down the posts of other users like that. Anyways, happy editing! Baristarim 03:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]