User talk:Dr.Biology/sandbox

Group Feedback from Osquaesitor:

General: - As you know, part of this draft required that you make plans for the images you wanted to use. You are doing a great job of making that plan. Also, complete or go back to the student training and you can also go here for a very comprehensive how-to and resources on contributing to Wikimedia. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents - The biggest issue I had with your page was one of navigation. You have a GREAT general organizational scheme, but Dr. Biology's personal work and the group work, as well as the chronology of which work is most recent (and therefore the focus of review), got mixed up easily. Please make some adjustments as you move forward. I suspect that this is an easy fix that might involve a simple sectional delineator and some parallel structure with the labeling of individual work and possibly consistent use of the third person. Specific section comments: - We have male sharks so that you can take pictures of those claspers....and those could be contributed to the clasper page. If your skate has claspers, that would also be great. Did you check to see what the stingray people were doing? I do not believe that they are doing reproduction, so you might ask if their specimen has claspers. -In the species differentiation page, you say that you plan on moving the mermaid's purse image here. From where? If you mean from the actual mermaid's purse page or from another page actively using it, I would not. You can link to it, or re-use it by modifying it if appropriate. Is this the ACTUAL mermaid's purse for this specific species? Please address these questions in your responses to peer review. Adding specific information as to the pages you want to edit/add to with links will alleviate confusion considerably. - You may want to consider taking a broader taxonomic approach and considering whether some of your proposed contributions might not be better of here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajiformes. Osquaesitor (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

PEER REVIEWS:

Skate Review

1. Content is very good and resourceful, there are no hints of bias and is very informative. Scientific terms are used when appropriate and links are provided to overlapping topics. 2. Sources are cited correctly and effectively throughout paragraphs. Most of the information used is directly from accredited scientific articles from studies specifically on skates, which is really good. 3. Structure of topics are well organized. One thing I might add though is putting the anatomy paragraph at the top so readers can picture the animal as a whole before reading more specific body functions! User:Burner112/sandbox is also working on the same article for stingrays it looks like so I would collaborate with them to see what topics they plan on adding as well. You guys could do some really cool work comparing and contrasting rays and skates. I think the workload is proportioned equally and I really like the idea of expanding from external and internal topics, I would suggest putting them in the same paragraphs for whatever topic you are working on so readers don't have to go back and forth. Picture ideas are good, I think labelling pictures from lab is an awesome idea, and as for the mermaid's purse, maybe you could find a new one rather than moving it from another section? or if you get lucky and receive a female skate for dissection you could include your own photos.

Skate Review GermanShortHair (talk) 06:30, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Reproduction: The content is concisely written, informative, and free of any plagiarism from sources provided. It is also free from grammatical and spelling errors. There are a couple more things I would like to know though - how many females to each male during mating? Where are the nursery grounds located? What percentage of the young actually survive? The section is good as is, but some more detail would be great! Anatomy: This section is also well written and mostly free of grammatical errors. I found that some of the sentences I had to read a couple of times before I could understand what was being said. There is a part where you say the placoid scale is composed of the same materials as teeth - maybe link to a teeth wiki article that tells what those components are so the reader gets a better idea of how the two are related? I do agree the previous reviewer that this section should be put before reproduction to provide a better flow of the article. Overall, very good start. I hope you get some good pictures from lab to amplify some of the points you have made!

Review Week 6

You are all off to a great start and have some great content that is very informative. Mckenna, I would recommend removing the sentence that says it has been compared to sand paper and exchange it for a more general but neutral statement of the skin has a rough texture. It also feels like you are trying to cover a lot of information at once, but you are doing it well. Kasey, I would also recommend watching some of your sentences, like "roughly, up to seven," it seems like you could pick one or the other and still be accurate. I might also suggest combining these into a reproduction and embryo genesis section to condense your work and tie them together. Madi, I think you are off to a great start and your topic will be very interesting for you! maybe try seeing if there are other species that have a similar EOD system that you can use for information. Theambivert20 (talk) 19:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Kuponya's Draft Review

Overall: Your statements are neutral and concise without any major grammatical errors that I could find. I looked at your sources and it seems that they are all reliable, academic sources except for one that is somewhat iffy and you may want to add an academic source just to back up what the source says (see below). You make it clear what pages will be edited and what your plans are for images and who will be editing what, with an even amount of work for each member. I didn't make a section for the Defense editing but I think that you have a well thought out plan that is specific and will help to clear up any confusion about the defense/communication issue, so great work on that. Reproduction: I thought that this section was well written and was has a good flow to it. I didn't see any grammatical errors or anything like that. I would suggest maybe finding more sources from an academic source to back up what you were saying about the skate. If you are still considering pictures to do as well, I think it could be interesting if you could a female and male skate in order to compare reproductive anatomy between the sexes. The information is neutral and concise, well done! Anatomy: I don't have many suggestions to give for your paragraph. I think that you have a good plan for your images and since you linked the conceptual words in your paragraph to places that define them, you have made your sentences much more concise. I also really like that you will link a video of the skate's movement to your paragraph, that's great. Kuponya (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review/Copy Edit #1 - Skate

Please see my Sandbox for your peer review, as well as the accompanying copy edits. Anāhitā (talk) 06:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Copy-pasted by osquaesitor: eer Review

   Neutral Content: This article contains very neutral content. Regarding the reproduction and species differentiation, be sure to include all distinct characteristics of egg cases, that are individualized to each species. Additionally, you may want to give examples of what species that these characteristics apply to. Regarding the external anatomy, be sure to include multiple viewpoints on the use of pelvic fins, by the skate, rather than relying on current research findings. Regarding the internal anatomy, be sure to include multiple resources, with adequate information on the electric organ, seeing as how the research on the electric organ is relatively limited.
   Reliable Sources: All of the resources appear to be reliable, and are primarily review articles. However you should avoid using primary literature, which does not show a collective overview of the topic at hand. Excellent job on your usage, and formatting, of resources, as well as in-text citations, which are also properly formatted.
   Clear Structure:
       This draft is very well organized, but is rather hard to follow. You may want to consider cleaning up your sandbox, to make the draft of your work more apparent, rather than your drafts being nested in the "team game plan" section. Make sure that your sections are in sequential order, and that the flow of your paragraphs is not distracting.
       It appears that you will be editing certain sections of the skate page, but I highly encourage you to explore other domains that are associated with the skate, which may need revision as well.
       Kasey will be working on the reproduction and species differentiation topics. Mckenna will be working on the external anatomy topic. Madi will be working on the internal anatomy topic.
       There seems to be an even distribution of contribution from all team members.
       Kasey would like to contribute images of the mermaid's purse. This is an excellent idea, and should prevail, due to the relevance of the mermaid's purse to reproduction. Mckenna would like to contribute images of the external anatomy from their dissection. I would highly recommend annotating the images. This will give readers an accurate sense of what you are discussing. Madi would like to contribute cartoon/diagramed images of the internal anatomy, as well as images of the internal anatomy from their dissection. Again, I would highly recommend annotating the images. This will give readers an accurate sense of what you are discussing.
       Make sure that you are entering all of these aspects (i.e., reproduction, species differentiation, external anatomy, internal anatomy) underneath their respective sections, and that the topics follow a sequential order.
   Integration: My team is currently investigating the external anatomy, as well as the internal anatomy, associated with the moray eel, which is similar to your team's investigation of the external anatomy, as well as the internal anatomy, of the skate. After reading your draft, I think it would be of great use to us to include annotated images of the external anatomy, as well as the internal anatomy, taken during our dissection of the moray eel.

Copy Edit #1 - Reproduction/Species Differentiation

Skates mate at the same nursery ground each year. In order to fertilize the egg, males use claspers, a structure attached to the pelvic fins. The claspers allow them to direct the flow of semen into the female's cloaca. Skates are oviparous, meaning they lay eggs with very little development in the mother. This is one major difference from stingrays, which are viviparous, meaning that they give birth to live young. When a female skate is fertilized, a protected case forms around the embryo called an egg case, or more commonly called a mermaid's purse. This egg case is then deposited out of the mother's body onto the ocean floor, where the skates develop for up to 15 months before they enter the external environment.

Egg cases have distinct characteristics that are individualized to each species. This makes a great tool for identifying different species of skates. One of these identifiable structures, is the keel. The keel is a flexible ridge that runs along the outside of the structure. Another characteristic is the number of embryos within the egg case. Some species contain only one embryo, while others can have up to roughly seven. The size of the fibrous shell around the case is another characteristic. Some species have thick layers on the exterior, however other species don't even have the presence of this layer. Copy Edit #2 - External Anatomy

Skates, like stingrays, have a distinct flat body shape with flat pectoral fins that extend throughout the length of their body. Their body shape and large pectoral fins allow them to glide close to the floor of their habitat in search for benthic prey. Another key external characteristic of the skate is its rough skin made of placoid scales. Placoid scales have a pointed tip that is oriented caudally and are made of the same composition as teeth. The skin texture has been compared to sand paper. Their mouths are located ventrally or on the underside of the body, and are made up of a moveable jaw, also assisting to their benthic feeding style. Skate's gill slits are located ventrally as well, but dorsal spiracles allow the skate to be partially buried in floor sediment and still complete respiratory exchange. Also located on the dorsal side of the skate are the eyes used for the awareness of predators and other surroundings. In addition to their pectoral fins, skates have a first and second dorsal fin, caudal fin, and paired pelvic fins. Current research suggests that some species of skates use these pelvic fins to perform ambulatory locomotion (watch a video here) on the water floor. This form of locomotion performed by the skate is being explored as a possible origin for our own development of walking, by looking for similar neural pathways used for movement between skates and animals walking on land. Copy Edit #3 - Internal Anatomy

   Skates are among the several species of electrogenic fishes, who produce weak electric organ discharges (EODs).
   The skate has small, paired, electric organs in the tail, that allow it the skate to send out weak electric signals for communication.
   They Skates do not produce strong enough currents to shock anythings.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osquaesitor (talk • contribs) 21:18, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 

Chondrichthyes Page Content

Your picture is awesome and the content is super informative, but I think the caption on the picture where it says "rostral is towards right" is slightly confusing. Is there a way you could possibly reword it to make it more of a full sentence? Jam7887 (talk) 20:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)