Jump to content

User talk:Downforwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Downforwiki (talk) 01:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template usage

[edit]

Hey,

It seems the template you used on User talk:MixedHarsH contained a live {{help me}} tag which, in case you were not aware, not only adds the page to Category:Wikipedians looking for help, but also sends an alert in to IRC as to the request for help... this is not a telling off, but please consider placing a template link instead using {{tl}} rather than the tag itself, I have changed it this time for you - RichT|C|E-Mail 22:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will Determine the precorstion for sureThank for addressing me out Downforwiki (talk) 23:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Downforwiki, your editing suggestions are on the way advocating history genera

[edit]

SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!



Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
298 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Philosophy of history (talk) Add sources
518 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Restorationism (talk) Add sources
46 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Feminist history (talk) Add sources
652 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Another One Bites the Dust (talk) Add sources
77 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Nationalist historiography (talk) Add sources
37 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Politics of memory (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Chronic endothelial injury hypothesis (talk) Cleanup
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 2008 Kremlin Cup – Men's doubles (talk) Cleanup
70 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Cavalier tank (talk) Cleanup
109 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Historiography of India (talk) Expand
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Historiography of science (talk) Expand
68 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Source criticism (talk) Expand
176 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B World history (field) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
156 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Islamic studies (talk) Unencyclopaedic
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C First presidency of Carlos Andrés Pérez (talk) Unencyclopaedic
66 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Building services engineering (talk) Merge
28 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Roaring Rapids (talk) Merge
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 21st Regiment of (Light) Dragoons (talk) Merge
8 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA History of Berliner FC Dynamo (1978–1989) (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Authorship and ownership in copyright law in Canada (talk) Wikify
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 2005–06 Segunda División (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Cleistothelebolus (talk) Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Baggio Il Gallo (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Asha Collins (talk) Orphan
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 12 Paces Without a Head (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 1864 Romanian general election (talk) Stub
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub .22 Winchester Centerfire (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 120th Regiment of Foot (1763) (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 1579 in Sweden (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 1,3,7-Trimethyluric acid (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Truthfindervert per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Truthfindervert. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:Downforwiki
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Downforwiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I acknowledge that the account "Downforwiki" was blocked as a sockpuppet. I apologize for creating this account in violation of Wikipedia's policies. My intention was to contribute positively to Wikipedia, but I now understand the seriousness of the situation. I assure you that I will adhere strictly to Wikipedia's guidelines going forward and will strive to make meaningful contributions under my main account. Please accept my sincerest apologies for any disruption caused Note:*This statement acknowledges the sockpuppetry and apologizes for the violation, while expressing a commitment to adhering to Wikipedia's policies in the future I sincerely apologize for any confusion caused and respectfully request the opportunity to continue editing I believe the block may not have been necessary to prevent damage or disruption, as my actions were not intended to deceive or harm Wikipedia. Additionally, I want to clarify that my conduct, whether under this account or any other IP address, is not connected in any way with the block. If the block was aimed at resolving a separate situation and I was unintentionally affected due to the use of the same IP range, I kindly request reconsideration.
I assure you that I deeply regret my actions and understand the impact they have had. I commit to never repeating such behavior and will strictly adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines going forward. Please accept my sincerest apologies for any disruption caused, and I hope for the opportunity to continue contributing positively to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

We do not consider chatbot generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 13:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Downforwiki (talk) 13:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reappeared to Block *Second Nomination

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Downforwiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrator, My Guanine Concern attributing from beigninng I am sorry to request a reconsideration of the block on the account “Downforwiki” for creating sockpuppets. I confess that I was at fault and violated some rules of Wikipedia. I sincerely apologize for making this account, my intentions were right but it doesn’t mean that it is correct now. In future, I promise to adhere strictly to Wikipedia’s policies with an aim of contributing more efficiently using my original account. Forgive me for all these negative aspects of my behavior. Note:*I do understand that such action is against WP policy and strongly appologise for it.I’m very sorry if there are any mistakes committed and kindly ask you oportunity for editing. My intention wasn’t to mess up with wikipedia, so there was no need for blocking as means of preventing anything wrong from happening, in my opinion. Furthermore, I want to point out that this behavior has no connection whatsoever with the block or another IP address. If there was a different problem and I am held captive without reason then please reconsiderteen..
I promise solemnly that this will never happen again but strict adherence to the rules of WP is guaranteed here.. These actions deeply regretted by myself after realizing how much damage I caused.Everyone who uses the internet can be targeted by cybercriminals. However, most are not aware of how serious this matter can become.” Downforwiki (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Ignoring the issue with sock puppetry, I don't think you have enough proficiency with English to edit English Wikipedia. Try the version of Wikipedia in your native language. You'll be able to communicate with the admins much easier (and they'll understand what you're saying), and you'll better understand the rules. See m:List of Wikipedias. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Thanks for addressing out but can i peruse my invoice in this account because apparently i don't have access of account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Downforwiki (talkcontribs)
Is English your first language? You might be better off editing Wikipedia in your native tongue. PhilKnight (talk) 16:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, But I initially work on improving my interaction skill, So probably yes but its not my mother language ok apart this can you elaborate my previous discussion with my due concern Thank you Downforwiki (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Doug Weller talk 11:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]