User talk:Douglarkin

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Douglarkin/Teacher quality has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teacher quality, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 04:14, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teacher quality.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 23:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Douglarkin, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 21:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Teacher quality.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharmlessCoin (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Douglarkin. You have new messages at CharmlessCoin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Teacher quality.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 19:54, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Teacher quality

Hello, Douglarkin! I'm Voceditenore. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Teacher quality.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teacher quality. Voceditenore (talk) 18:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Voceditenore asked me to comment on it, so I did so. DGG ( talk ) 00:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teacher quality assessment

Hi Doug, I'm sorry it's taken so long for me to get back to you. I had another look at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teacher quality. That formal request for comment caused a real mess. Especially since the person who started it never returned to the discussion. I see you also posted at DGG's page, perhaps, he'll have some suggestions. You could simply re-submit it for review and take your chances with another reviewer. It's rather different in emphasis and topic now from the one that was declined before. You could also simply move the draft yourself to Teacher quality assessment. WP:MOVE explains how to do this, although there's an increased chance that it might get proposed for deletion. Note that to be able to move a page on Wikipedia, you have to have at least 10 edits to article space. So you'd have to do that first. I wish I could be more helpful. Voceditenore (talk) 17:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug, me again. On DGG's advice here, I've done a bit more clean-up on the article and have moved it onto Wikipedia. You will find it at Teacher quality assessment where you and other editors can continue to expand and improve it. Many thanks for contributing to Wikipedia and best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 05:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doug, have you any use for Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Teacher quality. something needs to be done with it , as it is in the wrong name space. I can, with some difficulty, merge it into the history of the article, or if it was meant as your own working draft, I can simply delete it. Let me know. DGG ( talk ) 16:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DGG, thanks for all of your help on this. Feel free to delete the old page if you wish.Douglarkin (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)douglarkin[reply]