User talk:Dougk

Welcome!

Hello, Dougk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

bibliomaniac15 05:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Your quickness to become a remarkable Wikipedian and edit extensiveness doesn't have much need for a welcome template, but it is nice to start a talk page on a positive note.

The Saga of DougHolton

Dougk: cut out the bullshit and quit trying to censor other users. You deliberately removed my response in a debate about a page I created. That is censorship, and the fact that you have been doing similar stuff repeatedly is harrassment. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.138.37.99 (talk).

Erm, it's a matter of reading instructions, not censorship. Archived AfD debates have specific instructions in them to not alter the discussion. Please note, that in any case, I was not attacking you, I was simply restoring things back to the previous state, per Wikipedia policy. Believe it or not, I have nothing against you personally, despite the fact I may disagree with your actions. In any case, it's a moot point. -dougk (Talk ˑ Contribs) 19:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kids in the Hall

I will be replaceing any and all acts that you called "vandalism", because there were legitimate reasons for making the edits that I made, and you presented no case against them in any of the incidents. The writing is long winding and irrelevent to the topic at hand. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.175.11.236 (talk)

Just to note, the only thing I was able to see was a large deletion without any reason given in the edit summary. In the future, please try to note this in the edit summary, or perhaps on the entry's talk page to avoid confusion. My point wasn't to get into an edit war, but rather to prevent possibly relevant information from being deleted, accidentally or otherwise. If you feel the edit was justified, by all means, keep it—I'll trust you. Explaining your position to other editors is helpful, though. Thank you! (This message is being cross-posted to user's talk page.) -dougk (Talk ˑ Contribs) 21:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SMSD

Hey, did you go to a Shawnee Mission School, or just have an interest? I saw your comments on the Shawnee Mission District article, and wondered if you went to one. Troupkid 04:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Troupkid[reply]

Sorry for moving that around... but yeah, I did go to Shawnee Mission for my entire grade school career... I'll be happy to explain more if you've got specific questions. dougk (Talk ˑ Contribs) 06:29, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 05:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]