User talk:Doug Christian

Hey y'all. Please leave me a message!

Proposed deletion of Encyclopedia of Christianity

The article Encyclopedia of Christianity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not for listing links

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sasquatch t|c 00:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the link and the banner. I hope it will be OK now.

To me, it still is a little too vague to be an encyclopedia article and is pretty much still a list of links. I will give you some time to think of ways to maybe turn it into something that would be more substantive... But as it stands, it doesn't actually have much content and doesn't actually tell me anything about Encyclopedias of Christianity other than they exist. If you feel like this is all there is to say, then I would happily delete the page for you. Otherwise, I might nominate it for deletion in a bit if the content doesn't drastically improve. Cheers. Sasquatch t|c 01:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Christian, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Doug Christian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Encyclopedia of Christianity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Encyclopedia of Christianity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia of Christianity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Deadbeef (talk) 02:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

Congratulations! You have earned the

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! ~ Anastasia (talk) 18:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EofC refs

I've found several more reviews on EbscoHost. See the article talk page for the citations. If you don't have access to them, let me know, and I can email you the contents. LadyofShalott 21:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 09:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]