User talk:Doug Alder

Welcome!

Hello, Doug Alder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Computer Paper publication, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! moɳo 19:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Computer Paper publication

A tag has been placed on The Computer Paper publication requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. moɳo 19:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Computer Paper (magazine) article needs citations

Hello there Doug -- nice to see you online on WP!

You've added a lot of good info about the venerable old magazine -- until I saw your early draft the other day I hadn't realized that it was fully defunct.

Just wanted to say "thanks" for your efforts so far, and to let you know that the points that you are making in the article really ought to be cited wherever possible. For a sample, take a look at Wikipedia:Citation_templates and the "journal" citation template listed there. It would also be good to throw in references from outside of the publication (i.e. any of the magazines you list in the "References" section) as well as from The Computer Paper itself. Will see if I can find anything online and will add what I can to the article here.

On a different matter entirely, is there an archive of the old magazines somewhere, preferably digital? I have a bunch of the old articles and reviews that I wrote, but not whole magazines (I used to, but they were too bulky to carry around from move to move).

Cheers! Captmondo (talk) 11:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi K.

This may not be the best way to reply to you (I don't see the 'Reply' button anywhere, so here goes.

Not totally clear on how to 'throw in references'. Do you mean, take quotes out of the articles in the 'References' section and add them into the article?

As far as I know, the most likely source of the digital archives would be the last publisher, Scott Piccolo. I have been meaning to try and contact him, but he did not respond to my last email. It would definitely be cool to have that stuff available online. Some of it can be found on the waybackmachine, but it is spotty.

I think David Tanaka mentioned he had a garage full of mouldering issues, probably in Lethbridge.

Doug

Not to worry, I am "watching" your page on WP, so I will be notified when you (or anybody else) makes a change to it. I see you have attempted to throw in a reference to a Globe and Mail article -- do you have the day, author and page number reference for that as well? If so, let me know what it is and I'll throw it into the correct WP format for you.

Thanks for uploading the covers. If they are retained by WP (see discussion points at the bottom) I will see if I can PhotoShop them in order to clean them up a bit.

I have an accordion file filed with clippings of old articles/reviews I did, but nothing that contained a cover of the old magazine, so seeing the examples that you posted really brought me back.

By the way, to properly sign things in WP, on talk pages (like this one) use four tildes (~~~~). Cheers! Captmondo (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1993-08 The Computer Paper Cover Ontario Edition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1993-08 The Computer Paper Cover Ontario Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FinalRapture - † ☪ 02:46, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the photo in question is linked to the article The Computer Paper (magazine). I have updated more of the summary information and believe that it satisfies the requirements for fair use.

Orphaned non-free image File:1988-02 The Computer Paper Cover BC Edition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1988-02 The Computer Paper Cover BC Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FinalRapture - † ☪ 02:46, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the photo in question is linked to the article The Computer Paper (magazine). I have updated more of the summary information and believe that it satisfies the requirements for fair use.

The point is that the images are linked but not directly *used* within the article. I believe I have taken care of that by adding a "gallery" section to the article that uses both of the other cover images directly. Will check with FinalRapture as to whether or not that satisfies the requirements for keeping them.

By the way, for that Globe and Mail reference that you mention at one point, can you narrow it down to a specific date and page number? That would make for a solid citation to back up the point that you are trying to make.

Cheers! Captmondo (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing all that clean up on the text. I found the actual Globe and Mail article date and have included it. I have no page number, but it was the front of a section called The Entrepreneurs.

Doug

Looks like those extra covers for 'The Computer Paper' got deleted. Any suggestions for the best way to add them back so they are properly 'used', or linked so they won't get tagged for speedy deletion again?

Thanks. Doug Alder (talk) 05:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC) Doug Alder[reply]

I'm not sure there's anything you can do in this case. The original magazines are copyrighted, and are arguably rightfully owned by whoever now owns the name. Even if the answer to that is "nobody" standard copyright rules still apply. And you can't apparently list multiple covers in a gallery -- I disagree on the Wikipedia principle being applied by the person who deleted them, but he didn't comment on that point. In the end Wikipedia can't be the repository for all things, and I think having multiple covers of The Computer Paper is one of those occasions. Captmondo (talk) 15:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]