User talk:Doug4

Welcome

Hello, Doug4! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Wwwhatsup (talk) 03:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Doug, Thankyou for your addittions to Clay Shirky. I know it's frustrating that one can't preview references. You might want to try using the citation templates. Another very handy tool is Twinkle which will install citation buttons on your toolbar. Wwwhatsup (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wwwhatsup,

Thanks for your help. The link to citation templates was just what I was looking for. Also the other links I'll refer to as I take a more methodical approach to learning how to edit and how the Wikipedia community works.

Doug4 07:19, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Very good. You'll see that I've added things that I find useful to my user page.

I was in touch with Shirky this week. There's a possibility of setting up a debate between him and Jaron Lanier. Hope I can pull it off! Wwwhatsup (talk) 09:26, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A debate between Clay and Jaron would be very interesting. I must admit I know nothing of Jaron Lanier other than the Wikipedia article about him, which I just read after you mentioned him. A fascinating guy -- I'll be learning more about him. Doug4 10:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

See this [1]! Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read Chris Hedges' column "The Information Super-Sewer" to which you provided a link. After reading it I feel like Jaron Lanier needs a little vacation away from the Internet, TV, cell phones, computers and radio. Maybe in some little rural place where he can get some exercise and take in a bit of Nature. He seems a bit tightly wound.

I found the Google news archive to which you had a link on your user page really useful. Thanks. Doug4 06:37, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Yep. That archive is great isn't it. I'm considering getting a print sub to the NY Times just so I can access the full articles. Take a look, for instance, at how much I was able to dig up on Irving Plaza on a recent all-nighter. Lanier invented Virtual Reality - he has every right to become an apostate.. Wwwhatsup (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing. You gathered a huge amount of material. The archive is a powerful tool. You mentioned a print sub to the NY Times. What is that? In regard to Lanier, I respect his achievements, and I too at times feel many of the negative aspects of the Internet and it's impact on society. I'm interested in learning Wikipedia's policy on discussion of topics that aren't strictly Wikipedia-oriented, such as our discussions of Lenier. We could easily carry on our discussion by e-mail. Doug4 21:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Bob Hunter (Los Angeles sportswriter), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

A412 (Talk • C) 00:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help me with a photo.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I found a photo in Wikipedia Commons that I want to crop and include in an article. I thought it might be useful to others if my cropped photo was somehow associated with the original photo in Wikipedia Commons. Please tell me what I need to do. Thanks.

The URL of the Wikipedia original is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Moore_Gro%C3%9Fe_liegende_Frauenfigur_1957_Z%C3%BCrich.jpg

Doug4 20:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

When you upload your cropped version to the Commons, you'll be asked about the author and source. You should use those fields to establish the association, preferably including a link to the original at Commons:File:Moore Große liegende Frauenfigur 1957 Zürich.jpg (in fact the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License requires attribution, so it's not just useful, but necessary). Huon (talk) 21:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

100 Greatest African Americans

added links pointing to Richard Allen, Richard Wright, Jack Johnson, David Walker, Adam Clayton Powell and Charles Houston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of San Francisco State University people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theodore Roszak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lake Jasybay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kazakh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with editing an image file page. I brightened an image using Photoshop, and then uploaded it, creating a new file page, but I think it would be better if my image was included as a new version on the original image file page. How do I go about this?

In case it is helpful to see the pages that I am talking about, the original page is:

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Charles_Leadbeater_author_of_WeThink_2008-09-17.JPG

My version is:

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Charles_Leadbeater_author_of_WeThink_2008-09-17b.jpg

Thanks in advanced.

Doug4 21:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

There's an "upload a new version of this file" link at the bottom of the "file history" section of the file page at the Wikimedia Commons (not on the local English Wikipedia version of that file page). You can use that to add your version on the original file page and then tag your version for speedy deletion as an accidentally-created duplicate; see commons:Commons:Speedy deletion for details on speedy deletion on the Commons. Huon (talk) 21:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Easier method of adding citations

Hi. Thanks for improving Amara Sinha. I noticed that you added a new reference but did not add its ISBN number. Please check out this video on how to easily cite sources using the ISBN number or even a Google Books URL. This will save you a lot of typing :) Just an FYI.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 12:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cpt.a.haddock: Thanks for the tip about using the cite button! It saves so much time! Doug4 05:00, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) Incidentally, the page parameter is for the page that you're citing and not the total number of pages in the book/paper. In this case, it should be 15 rather than 249. While this is not important, for the sake of brevity, you can also remove some of the cruft from the URL; i.e., you can shorten it to just https://books.google.com/books?id=YCJrUfVtZxoC&pg=PA15 . Even https://books.google.com/books?id=YCJrUfVtZxoC will do as the page number is being specified elsewhere. Cheers.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 07:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cpt.a.haddock: Thanks. I'm glad to find out how to edit a Google Books URL :) --Doug4 20:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

:) Good luck.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 16:12, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your edit to AFI's 100 Years...100 Cheers has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

McLuhan quote on systems

I've started a topic on Talk:System about whether the quote is worth keeping. Not sure how much engagement it will bring, if any. cheers, Just plain Bill (talk) 16:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up, Bill. I rewrote the paragraph about McLuhan without using the quote. Cheers, Doug4 (talk) 22:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Maniitsoq structure. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Diannaa, for explaining that. I'll fix it. Cheers! Doug4 (talk) 22:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maniitsoq structure

Your editing of this article has been very problematic. It's obvious for whatever reason that you are really invested in presenting the scientific consensus that this is probably not an impact structure as wrong, and unduly presenting primary scientific research papers supporting the impact hypothesis as more valid, such as dedicating an enormous section to the 2023 paper (that nobody appears to have even cited just yet) that I've just trimmed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. Thanks for pointing it out to me. I went overboard.

I think it is fair to say that the Maniitsoq impact proposal has not been confirmed one way or the other. The studies of Garde contrasts with those of Yakymchuk and Kirkland, and at present Garde's of 2023 is the last published. Regards, Doug4 (talk) 19:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]