User talk:Dottygray

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Chuck Lorre. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Leonard Hofstadter. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:54, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Leonard Hofstadter. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 04:59, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to The Big Bang Theory. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Leonard Hofstadter is NOT a real person! I was in no way vandalizing.}}

I have contacted the blocking admin. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 18:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

The reason recorded in your block log is "violations of the biographies of living persons policy" which as you point out is not correct. However, you were aggressively pushing your point of view in the article. In the future, you should follow the bold, revert, discuss cycle or you will likely be blocked again for edit warring and point of view pushing.

Request handled by: Beeblebrox (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.