User talk:Doomsdayer520/Archive 4

The Beatles Invite

	Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.
Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet! Todo list:

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Doomsdayer520. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crash Endless.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crash Endless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Music Barnstar

		The Music Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of 60s/70s Cambodian pop/rock music! — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature also has an unescaped pipe character. Wikipedia:Signatures says that the pipe character must be escaped.

You are encouraged to change

<font face="Calibri">[[User:Doomsdayer520|<font color="MediumSeaGreen">'''D<small>OOMSDAYER</small>520'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|Talk]]|[[ Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|Contribs]])</font> : DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs)

to

<span style="font-family: Calibri">[[User:Doomsdayer520|<b style="color: MediumSeaGreen">D<small>OOMSDAYER</small>520</b>]] ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|Talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|Contribs]])</span> : DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Khmer personal names

Hi again. I noticed this edit earlier today and decided to drop you a quick note about Khmer naming customs. Forgive me if you're already aware of them. Khmer don't have "family names" as Westerners do. Historically, they only used a given name. In modern times, they also use their father's first name as a disambiguator that has become a de facto surname, but it is not a "family name" as it is only shared by siblings. So in this case, "Nimol" is her given name and "Chhom" would be her father's given name. Individuals are properly called by either their given name only or their full name, but never by what we would consider their "last name". In fact, as it is practically taboo to call an elder by their given name, Khmer people often take offence when called only by their "last name" (i.e. their father's name).

I'm not aware of any policy regarding this on Wikipedia, but in the past we have tended to avoid using last-name-only references. See for example Hun Sen where he is referred to by his full name throughout, and Sinn Sisamouth, where is is mostly referred to by his first name (Sisamouth). Likewise Bun Rany, Sam Rainsy, etc.--William Thweatt ^TalkContribs 02:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@WilliamThweatt: Thanks for the input; I will not pretend to be an expert on this topic. But note that Wikipedia has this: Template:Cambodian name, which I used at the top of the Chhom Nimol article. That template uses the term "family name" and it appears to be poorly equipped for the complex matters that you described. Someone with your knowledge could possibly adjust how that template works. As for Chhom Nimol, I have seen/heard American interviews in which the interviewer tries to be friendly by calling her Chhom, and she simply replies that her first name is second. I will adjust her article and Dengue Fever (band) based on your advice. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Thais are often called "the polite people" but Khmer society could give them a run for their money with intricate rules of etiquette (ranging from how/where to sit to how to walk to "saving face" during conversations) that are ingrained literally from birth. The example you gave is typical; pointing out the interviewer's faux pas or showing irritation would have been a worse breach of etiquette than the original offence. Regarding the template, I did notice it specifically because it has been changed since the last time I had occasion to use it. The documentation at Template:Cambodian name still notes the preferred Khmer usage, but I have a hard time believing that editors read the documentation every time they place a template. The template itself used to include similar wording but it seems to have been changed in 2015 with this edit. I will change it back.--William Thweatt ^TalkContribs 07:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ginger Potatoes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ginger Potatoes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Circular reference

Hi. Please remember that per WP:CIRCULAR, "Do not use articles from Wikipedia (whether this English Wikipedia or Wikipedias in other languages) as sources. Also, do not use websites that mirror Wikipedia content or publications that rely on material from Wikipedia as sources." I removed a reference that you added to the article Sinn Sisamouth because that website copied verbatim the content from Wikipedia. Thinker78 (talk) 05:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

@Thinker78: I am completely aware of all that. Note in the article's talk page that the whole thing is a work in progress and I asked for assistance in finding better sources. That particular reference was intended to be a placeholder until someone else comes forward with something more reliable, perhaps in another language. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

But why use an unreliable circular reference as a placeholder? I mean the source was a verbatim copy of the Wikipedia entry. Nevertheless I have to say that all the work you are doing is worthy of praise. Thinker78 (talk) 03:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

@Thinker78: Just so you know, there is a growing body of articles on Cambodian rock musicians of the 1960s-70s, a scene of great interest to geeky rock historians. Information about the musicians' lives and accomplishments was largely lost during the Cambodian genocide and enthusiasts have been slowly cobbling it back together by general consensus, but of course online sources are copying each other. This problem was noted at Sinn Sisamouth with a "refimprove" tag for 5 years before I started working on it. The circular reference and its associated info was all over the various articles for years, and I have been rearranging the info in preparation for more research. My explanation for your basic question is "Wikipedia is not a final draft," and you noticed my partially-complete actions over a few days on an article that was an absolute disaster for many years. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:34, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

By random chance I happened upon the article when you were editing. If I had come upon the article before you I probably would have removed those circular references, because it makes no sense using as a reference the version of the article of 2007. Someone may as well, and I would support them. But I recognize all the hard work you do. Kudos! Thinker78 (talk) 00:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

@Thinker78: You noticed the problematic reference in the middle of my multi-day research effort to overhaul the article, and I found more reliable alternatives, so problem solved. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Related to Book of Ryan Redirect

The page Book of Ryan was redirect to the artist page (Royce). The recent updates regarding the album suggest that the page must be updated and restored. https://hiphopdx.com/news/id.46295/title.royce-da-59-shares-tracklist-for-book-of-ryan-calls-it-his-greatest-piece-of-work http://www.xxlmag.com/news/2018/03/royce-59-book-of-ryan-cover-tracklist/

The above links are a good source of information. Abhinav0908 (talk) 09:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

@Abhinav0908: -- Good for Royce for finally getting the album confirmed after hyping it up for a couple of years. That's why the album article was unsatisfactory before now. I will reverse the redirect shortly and then you can improve the album article with the new sources that you found. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

@Doomsdayer520: -- Hello! Thanks for reverting the redirect. I will add the required data as soon as possible.Abhinav0908 (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

BAND-MAID release

It was released as an iTunes single https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DbSsoN-VwAA786f.jpg:large — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rov124 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		An award to Doomsdayer520 for spending plenty of time improving the Sinn Sisamouth article. Thinker78 (talk) 04:11, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Question regarding edits to 2 Cool 4 Skool

Hi Doomsdayer520! I noticed on the page 2 Cool 4 Skool you made the infobox type an EP. The problem is that the album isn't an EP, but rather a single album. I noticed your explanation for the changes was "fixing non-standard infobox", so is there any way to make it standard without having the infobox falsely display that it's an EP? Thanks! Nyantatata ^-^ ^{(Say hi!)} 21:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

@Nyantatata: Sorry for the delay, I was off the grid for about a week. There is a group of Wikipedia volunteers called the Albums Project in which album articles are categorized via the fields in the infobox, and HERE you will see the agreed-upon album types. ------ It is my understanding that long ago, the folks in the project decided that the old and general term "EP" could be used for albums that are described as "single album" or "mini album" in some regions. (For instance, I have only ever seen the term "single album" in Asian pop, but I could be wrong.) If it's an album that is shorter than usual, the term "EP" is a nice general category. If you find that to be inaccurate or outdated, you could raise the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. ------ Note that all of this only applies to the infobox, and you could use the term "single album" in the article's main text. Sincerely ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Sources for albums

I would like to respond to your message to EddieHugh because I have a lot of experience using AllMusic (I subscribe to it) and some experience working with EddieHugh. He doesn't need me to say so, but I have never questioned his integrity or his diligence. He is also patient, which many people on Wikipedia (and off) are not. I don't know anything about the example raised, but I do know that AllMusic often makes mistakes, not merely on release dates but on all other matters, such as labels, personnel, song credits, song titles, and so on. Moreover, much of their material is inchoate. EddieHugh once suggested that it's because they have a small staff. Possibly. Sign of the times: too much information, too much work, too few people, too few competent people. Jazz is unpopular. I imagine most resources are spent on more popular music. This is true everywhere else, so why wouldn't it be true at AllMusic?

According to Wikipedia rules, these sources can't be used: Amazon, itunes, Discogs.com, Musicbrainz, RateYourMusic, Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud, LastFM, because they are retail sites or because they rely on user-generated content or both. The best source for an album is probably the album itself, and yet many liner notes and album covers have mistakes. That means we rule out perfection and accept fallible sources and try to come as close to accuracy as we can. For years I've been looking for a better source for release dates of albums. I've written about this subject quite a bit and have exchanged posts about it with EddieHugh and others. If you have a solution, I'm eager to hear it.
Vmavanti (talk) 17:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

@User:Vmavanti - Thanks for the input. I have merely disagreed with Eddie's logic in one particular article, and have full respect for his knowledge and professionalism. Regarding this general topic, personally I find it illogical to assume that sources that made some mistakes in the past can never be trusted ever again. See WP:ALBUMS (The Albums Project) in which AllMusuc has been deemed reliable and essential for info on hundreds of thousands of album articles. In the event of uncertainty in an AllMusic entry, other sources can be used for corroboration. For the album in which Eddie and I disagreed, there is an announcement from the record company's own website that gives that album's release date. Your concerns, and Eddie's, about source reliabiity are valid but for that particular album a whole bunch of outlets say it was released in 2010. What's not to believe? Thanks again. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 02:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

I use AllMusic all the time, but I get exasperated at the number of mistakes. You can submit corrections to AllMusic. There's a form on the site with the usual caveats. AllMusic is owned by Tivo. I would like to know where Tivo gets its information. I put the following on my User Page as advice for possible sources:

• The album itself
• The musician's official web site
• The record label's web site
• Billboard magazine or web site
• DownBeat magazine or web site
• JazzTimes magazine or web site
• A book, such as a biography, about the subject
• A book about the record label
• AllMusic.com
  Vmavanti (talk) 17:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Just to clarify...

...I thought your own comments were sensible and just on the AfD even if I disagree with your conclusion. I follow AfDs about articles of women (even though I am of the male persuasion, it turns out to be a good place to find material that belongs in our project and can qualify with a polish.) I am more interested in women scholars and academics and techies and politicians than in entertainers, but if I have some spare time I will try to improve those as well, if they seem notable.

Nearly all of the AfDs I read are well-reasoned, and I agree with the nominator. I do have a special resentment, triggered by this particular AfD, of nominators and others who treat bio subjects with undeserved contempt, in this case ostensibly because the article is badly written by amateurs--first the AfD nominator spending 8 paragraphs mocking the subject of the bio, and the very next commenter calling her "this chick." I did not intend to criticize you or other helpful commentators, even those who disagree with me. Your talk page or mine seems a better place to discuss this, if you want to, than anybody's AfD. HouseOfChange (talk) 18:53, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Team Allok

Dear @Doomsdayer520 I am creating the article Team AllOk which is not completed. I request your kind self to keep the article unchanged till it is completed. --Thank You TheUnbeatable (talk) 15:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

@TheUnbeatable:. Okay, see Template:Under construction for a notice that you can place at the top of the article until done. Note that my changes were related to Wikipedia's formatting guidelines and would have been caught by other editors eventually. Good luck with the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

@Doomsdayer520: Thanks a lot for your suggestion. I will definitely use those tools.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MelbaMoore ThisIsIt.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MelbaMoore ThisIsIt.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nigel Glockler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steve Howe, GTR and Toyah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state routes in Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pine Grove, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Dresses (band)

I took your suggestion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Heller, i.e. "This could very well be transformed into an article on the band Dresses, which may have enough media notice for a stub article." I am on the fence in regard to whether or not it meets WP:NBAND in its current form. What do you think? Any suggestions for improving it? — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 09:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

@Godsy: - While doing the research for my vote in the Timothy Heller discussion I found that every magazine article, album review, etc. that mentioned Timothy was actually about Dresses, and said much more about the band. Therefore I suggested that an article on Dresses might be more viable than an article on an individual member. But that article, if you create it, would have to stand on its own merits too. I think they might be able to squeeze into a few of the requirements for WP:NBAND such as #1 and maybe #4, but I can't guarantee that everyone else would agree. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:07, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Delsort to country

Isn't it agreed that music and books are sorted into the country category where it's released. At least that's what I take of it based on the United States delsort discussion. Also, the music album was related to music so why was that sorting undone? PS. I've looked at the Delsort WikiProject and it says to sort deletion into relevant categories. Is there something I'm missing? Also, why did you removed it out of the music category and back into the unsorted category? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 19:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

@Tyw7: Sorry for the delay in this response. The Delsort Project has guidelines but not hard-and-fast rules. You are missing the spirit of delsorting, in which AfDs are sorted toward communities of editors that are able and willing to add their expertise to deletion discussions. For example, the Deletion Sorting page for Malaysia is probably patrolled by experts on that country who can discuss the merits of articles about that country, such as politics, history, geography, etc. That Westlife DVD is not about Malaysia just because it was released in that country, and while you sorted the AfD discussion to five countries plus the continent of Asia, what about all the other countries in which it was released? It's a worldwide media product released in dozens of additional nations, so your delsort was not only heavy-handed but also incomplete. That's why delsort should be used sparingly.

Meanwhile, my example of the Malaysia-related deletion discussions page doesn't have much happening, but any Malaysia expert is likely to ask why the AfD for an international DVD is cluttering up their page. Hkhohh got in trouble for this, including at the Bands and musicians page where he/she was putting AfDs for albums that were released by bands, fictional characters in TV shows about music, actors who play fictional musicians, etc. I and the other regulars on that page found all of the non-musician AfDs placed there by Hkhohh to be annoying and distracting. That's why the delsort process is supposed to be used sparingly, not for the fun of sorting AfDs to as many discussion pages as you can think of. The Malaysia page is for AfDs on topics about that country, the Bands and musicians page is for AfDs about actual musicians, etc. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

How about fictional characters who are musicians? They probably go into the Bands and Musicians page. --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

@Tyw7: Personally, I would say no to that because evidence of their notability would not come from the world of music but from the world of books or TV shows or movies in which they were created. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

But technically they are musicians. So people patrolling that page may have heard of them. There are several "fictional" bands. It's probably a gray area.--Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 18:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Wrong use if the word "technically". ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 18:09, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Add the album cover The Very Best of George Benson: The Greatest Hits of All (If you can)

Hello Doomsdayer520! I want to thank you for adding the album cover The Greatest Hits of All by George Benson, whose page I created. If it's not too much to ask, see if you can also add the album cover The Very Best of George Benson: The Greatest Hits of All, that I created too. I liked your collaboration and wanted to know if you can help me again. Thanks for everything!

Done! Note that this compilation album is not listed at George Benson discography and that is why I missed it. A few days ago I went down that list and found other George Benson albums that had no covers. So you might want to add to that discography list. Sincerely, ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state routes in Pennsylvania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Philipsburg, Pennsylvania and Fredericksburg, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Doomsdayer520. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right may be revoked by an administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:10, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

2 new

Finally got around to starting Liev Tuk and Meas Samon, rounding out the list of Cambodian Rocks artists. Only slightly more available on Tuk than Samon, but it sure seems like there's a ton of media available about Samon that isn't in English. Typically hate to start a stub so small as that one, but filed it under "better a stub than nothing". — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

What are your thoughts on a WP:NAVBOX? My first thought was, now that we have an article about everyone on Cambodian Rocks, to base it on that, but that would be pretty unusual. Better may be a period-specific Cambodian music navbox, but I'm not quite sure how to clearly articulate which articles it would include. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:51, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: - I think a navbox might be useful but the articles are pretty far-flung and you are correct on how it would be tough to articulate the focus. We've been blue-linking all the associated articles to the best of our abilities and that should suffice for now. What I would really like to see is for Music_of_Cambodia#Mid-twentieth_century (which you and I have discussed before) to be fully expanded or even spun off into its own article, similar in quality to Cambodian Rocks, but we will probably need actual Cambodians to help out and none seem to be interested.

Note that in addition to Cambodian Rocks we now also have articles for almost everybody specifically profiled in Don't Think I've Forgotten except for Baksey Cham Krong and Pou Vannary. While we're on that subject, I'd love for you to take a look at my own recent article if you have the time: Drakkar (band). Thanks! ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

except for Baksey Cham Krong -  Done Baksey Cham Krong. Not much there yet, but seems like there's enough to justify an article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:50, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: - That was fast! My schedule is a bit cramped but I will check this out early next week. I hereby volunteer to take a try at Pou Vannary, also next week, unless you have already started. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:13, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

I have not started, and wasn't planning on it (in the near future). Will be happy to take a look when you do. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. ()

Hello Doomsdayer520, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

• New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
• Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
• Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

• Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

• The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:StevieB Terminator.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StevieB Terminator.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Palms

Don’t worry, I have other pages I’m watching to delete the word “upcoming”. And most probably someone else will delet that anyway. ~SML • TP 17:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hefty Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Justin Biltonen

I Just wanted to thank you (sarcasm) for reverting my Justin Biltonen page. I will just have to do it over again. He is a famous person and should deserve his own Wikipedia. If you don't agree then feel free to call the Wikipedia police. --Jarmusic2 (talk) 19:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)jarmusic2--Jarmusic2 (talk) 19:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

User:Jarmusic2 - Looks like the Wikipedia police beat me to it. The problem is that there is nothing to say about Justin Biltonen except that he is in 3 Doors Down. That wasn't sarcasm. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

[[User:Jarmusic2| thank you for the input. Iv'e seen articles of famous movie stars with just a few words an there still on Wikipedia. maybe I should start deleting those articles until they can meet the Wikipedia standards, also I will work on my article so that it meets the requirements as well. again thank you and I'm sorry about the sarcasm comet. You were just doing your job.

Recycling in Israel

I de-prodded your tag because this is likely to be controversial, like all articles about the country (see Palestinian law). Please go to WP:AfD instead. 19:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Blakiston's Line

Thanks for your review of Blakiston's Line and your encouragement, Doomsdayer520. Carol (Talk) 04:56, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state routes in Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benton, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The Impossible Elephant

Thank you very much for reviewing The Impossible Elephant; I have given you a barnstar on your user page as gratitude. Cheers! NowIsntItTime 19:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

@NowIsntItTime: - And thank you for the barnstar! ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Hi Doomsdayer520 Regarding the article: David C. Kang, Thank you for your feedback for David C. Kang, would you please check the article and improve it or remove the tagged notice below? {{notability|1=Biographies|date=August 2018}} Goodtiming8871 (talk) 04:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

@Goodtiming8871: - Thanks for the balaclava! The Kang article looks good and you did a lot of nice work, so I removed that "notability" tag. The only minor problem is that Wikipedia does not like to store people's CV's, per WP:RESUME, so I removed that link. Keep up the good work! ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your update and contributions to Wikipedia Goodtiming8871 (talk) 01:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

"A page you started (Yitzchak Sheilat) has been reviewed" - response

You wrote:

"Thanks for your new article on Rabbi Yitzchak Sheilat, but note that another editor has already alerted the community to several problems concerning citations and notability. Address these matters as best you can, or the article could be deleted. Good luck."

I made a number of changes to the article in response, and wrote on Rosguill's page that I made corrections and that I would be happy to hear any other specific comments/suggestions regarding problems in the article.

I have not received any response since, so it is difficult for me to understand the intent and purpose of your warning.Cm613 (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@Cm613: - Articles with those various tags about notability, original research, etc. appear on lists perused by other editors, and someone following that path may decide that the article is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Sorry if I gave the impression that I might do such a thing myself, I merely meant to point out that it could be possible. If nobody else objects to the article then you will be fine. But if you haven't already, you should certainly take a look at WP:BLP for policies about biographical articles, which must be solidly supported. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I fixed up the language and added other independent sources (Jerusalem Post & Makor Rishon newspaper articles, an academic text from U. of Texas), so I assume that it is now more consistent with Wikipedia style and policies. Cm613 (talk) 07:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Robert Parucha

Hi, thanks for the tip about the actor, Robert Parucha. Good idea. Thanks and I'll see what I can do over the next couple of weeks. Cheers Karl Twist (talk) 08:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

"Ways to improve Lafayette-Moraga Regional Trail"

Please feel free to let me know which parts of the article need additional citations. It's not obvious from the message you left on my talk page. Thanks. A5 (talk) 00:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

@A5: - Actually, what happened is that I am part of a Wikipedia team that reviews new articles for suitability, and when we click a field the system shoots you an automatic message titled "Ways to improve..." which may not have been the most accurate title in this case. At the time, the formatting of some of the references needed to be cleaned up, which a different editor did. The article looks very good and I will only suggest that you revisit it occasionally to add any new details that might arise in the future. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:40, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you.A5 (talk) 00:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

James Mackintosh Kennedy

Thank you for your kind words: "Thanks for your informative new article on James Mackintosh Kennedy." It was a huge challenge, my first attempt. Question: I have compiled "Letters to My Daughters: 1900-1916" (Kennedy's letters) - unpublished, about 65 pages, annotated - I'd be glad to share them with anyone interested - how should I present this? A section labeled Letters, with a note to contact through Talk? I also have an unpublished biography document, about 130 pages. How should I offer to share that? JMKgreatgrand (talk) 22:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

@JMKgreatgrand: - My recommendation is to add a brief statement to the end of the Writings section. Since those documents have not been published, listing them is not exactly encyclopedic. But you could say something like "Kennedy's family has annotated a collection of his letters and compiled an autobiographical document" (or whatever is most accurate). ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, I added your recommendation. A cousin added ref to Bannockburn honor. I'm thinking of adding a humorous poem or two. I will find articles which need a link to JMK so it won't be an orphan. Thanks so much. I'm so proud to have it accepted. JMKgreatgrand (talk) 23:30, 9 September 2018 (UTC) I did add a reference in Aberlemno, but I am hesitant to impose on the article about Robert Williams Buchanan - JMK was a good friend and named his son after RWB and wrote a couple of poems about RWB. Orphan notice is still there, how does it get removed? JMKgreatgrand (talk) 23:49, 9 September 2018 (UTC) I've added citations to Writings, how do I remove the notice to add citations? Do I need to reference the books any more than just stating the names? JMKgreatgrand (talk) 03:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC) Added link in Robert Williams Buchanan Wiki page and in Scottish Americans. Shouldn't still be orphan.JMKgreatgrand (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@JMKgreatgrand: - See Wikipedia:Citing sources for everything on citations; it takes a lot of practice, but in the future you can always call on interested persons for assistance. At the J.M.K. article it looks like another editor has already helped out with formatting the footnotes. Meanwhile, the tags like "Orphan" and "Citations Needed" are simply code that can be edited like anything else. I will remove the Orphan notice. Overall, remember that Wikipedia articles are allowed to evolve over time, so there is time to practice the formatting and other details as long as an article's facts are supported. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Citations for Eugene Allen Noble

I just added some additional sources for Eugene Allen Noble. Let me know if you think this sufficiently addresses the issue. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 22:48, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that I removed the BLP template you added because it's not a BLP page. It is a biographical article, but the subject has been dead since '48. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

@Wikieditor19920: Oops, you are correct about the BLP template, inappropriate for the deceased gentleman. I hit the wrong button somewhere. Otherwise, you found some good additional material and the article is in excellent shape. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanx for the kudos, Doomsdayer520!!! Seriously! You're the first compliment I've ever got in here! My Low profile I guess. Usually I'm just ever-so-slightly stalked by a few folks who take umbrage at anything I do (Hiya Frank!).

albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally Known as Al Gordon 17:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanx!

Thanx for the kudos, Doomsdayer520!!! Seriously! You're the first compliment I've ever got in here! My Low profile I guess. Usually I'm just ever-so-slightly stalked by a few folks who take umbrage at anything I do (Hiya Frank!).

albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally Known as Al Gordon 17:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018

Hello Doomsdayer520, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news

• The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.

As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.

• There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.

Other

• A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.

Moving to Draft and Page Mover

• Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
• If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
• Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
• The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js^(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
• The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget. In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions. MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues. User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page) User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50). User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you. User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link. User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion. User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Doomsdayer520. AfC submissions Random submission ~6 weeks 1,032 pending submissions to update I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Wikipedia editor. Would you please consider applying to become an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. After requesting to be added to the project, note that reviewing is not mandatory, and can be done at your convenience. You can read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 17:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

@SkyGazer 512: Thanks for the invitation. Just wanted to let you know that I will be scarce for several days, and I'm not sure if I even have time to join this additional team though I would certainly love to help out. In any case, I may decide to go ahead with the process to join, but if so it will be a couple of weeks from now. Thanks again. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your review of the Way Down South album page. I fixed the AllMusic reference issue; I forgot the class attribute. Cheers! RubenSchade (talk) 22:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@RubenSchade: Thanks for the barnstar!!! ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 12:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Cover art question

Thank you for reviewing my article for Flamingo Breeze. I noticed you changed the cover art, which I don't mind, but I was curious if there's some policy about what cover to use for reissues. I uploaded the previous cover since it represented the original release, which was on cassette. RoseCherry64 (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

@RoseCherry64: - Actually there is no set policy on this, but in the event of different cover art being available, "common practice" is to use an image from the product most likely to be available to the public, and I figured that would be the square image from a CD or iTunes page, etc. There would be no dispute if you'd like to re-upload the cassette image, but the square image is more likely to comply with what we see in other articles for recent albums. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state routes in Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pleasantville, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Chrysilia

Hello, following recent changes, the “fan page” tagged “Chrysilia” page is, at least to my eyes, on the neutral side and everything is based on references with no personal comments or fan trivia. Would you have anything more to suggest? Many thanks Ypsus (talk) 01:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ypsus: - It looks better, thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 12:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Never Too Late (Jimi Jamison album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AOR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Scratching the Door: The First Recordings of the Flaming Lips Redirection...

So as far as I can tell, you are trying to redirect the page Scratching the Door: The First Recordings of the Flaming Lips to the main Flaming lips article because it doesn't meet Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. While I do understand your concerns, it's not like there aren't a bunch of other Wikipedia album pages that are just like that. Also, the source that I cited was a pretty good one. Even if it isn't, why not just expand the page yourself with better sources instead of trying to redirect it? In fact, I actually found a couple good extra sources myself that I will now use. Hopefully, that will put an end to this problem.--Neateditor123 (talk) 21:33, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123

@Neateditor123: - I am not the person who redirected the article or is trying to do so. I simply chose to explain why others have done that and for what reason. Also, deleting and redirecting are two different things. Make sure you know who you're talking to, and see the other stuff exists argument as well. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

@Doomsdayer520: Oh, sorry. I accidentally said "deleted" instead of "redirected". I didn't mean to say that you (or anyone else) was trying to delete it. Hopefully, we can get this whole issue fixed really quickly. Also, you'll notice that I just added more information and sources to the page in question. Hopefully, that will help. Let me know.--Neateditor123 (talk) 21:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123

Greetings from Tennessee

Thank you for catching my mistake! I'm using a custom built semi-automated solution similar to WP:AWB that does make me preview pages but the preview functionality has been acting up lately and it didn't work properly for that edit. Appreciate you catching the error. :-) --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Zackmann08: - No problem. If you're focused on album infoboxes, errors are listed on this page: [1]. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Oh freaking awesome!!! That is my new home page. :-p Ok not really, but I'm adding that to my list of tracked categories. Template you might be interested in... {{Category count}}. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)