User talk:DoomedToRepeatHistory

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, DoomedToRepeatHistory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 02:50, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, DoomedToRepeatHistory. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article L.K. Samuels, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant, DoomedToRepeatHistory!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please address the lack of citations (in the lede and narrative sections) and the overquotations in the reception section. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Pact of Pacification) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pact of Pacification, DoomedToRepeatHistory!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks! Great Article.

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robert G. (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Controversy over Hitler's participation in the Bavarian Soviet Republic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Controversy over Hitler's participation in the Bavarian Soviet Republic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, DoomedToRepeatHistory

Thank you for creating Slavery as a positive good.

User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

An interesting, well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:46, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Thievocracy, from its old location at User:DoomedToRepeatHistory/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 00:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Revolutionary Fascist Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolutionary Fascist Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolutionary Fascist Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 21:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thievocracy

Hello, DoomedToRepeatHistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thievocracy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 14:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]