Jump to content

User talk:Doomdorm64

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Doomdorm64, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Doomdorm64! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pseudo-Legendary Pokémon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You should not redirect pages without first discussing it on the article´s talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.237.127.33 (talk) 16:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


June 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Ryan Gage seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders18:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ryan Gage. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop using that photo. It's not appropriate to use it in an article about the actor, and the non-free license does not allow its use here. Meters (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested topic area

[edit]

Hi Doomdorm64,

Welcome! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your great edits related to our project WikiProject Video games. We are a group of editors working on improving articles in the scope of this project, and we need your help to meet the project goals. Please come over to our project page to take a look!

  • You will see a list of articles that need most improvement.
  • You will find a group of editors who share similar interest with you.
  • Overall, this is a friendly place to discuss any issues related to Video games, ask questions, and collaborate on improving articles on Video games!

Feel free to contact me at my talk page if you have any questions. Hope you will have fun here, and let us know if you need any help! -Thibbs (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Instead of tagging dozens and dozens of article's for barelinks, you might consider using WP:Refill to fix them instead. -- ferret (talk) 15:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. You added it to an article that had two bare links .. out of 40. {{link rot}} is for articles with serious bare link problems. -- GreenC 21:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And you added it to an article with nine (stable) bare links out of 62; an article which is obviously under active revision. If you would like to be helpful, jump in and fill those remaining links. Oddjob84 (talk) 13:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Doomdorm64, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Contrasting and categorization of emotions have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Asperger syndrome

[edit]

Please note that per WP:SPS, wikis are not considered reliable sources and should not be used in citations. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

That source

[edit]

Hi there, regarding my revert: when you find a source such as this, it is always a good idea to go to its main page https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TAXM7NNYTloC and check the publishing data at the bottom. In this case it just gives the title of the book and "PediaPress" as a publisher. That should ring an alarm bell . Indeed, I searched for a few sentence fragments in the book, and they all pointed to our Time article. This book is based on Wikipedia, so we definitley cannot use it here per wp:CIRCULAR. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 08:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, see also what it says on the first page: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TAXM7NNYTloC&pg=PAi - DVdm (talk) 09:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Mario Kart DS.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been warned by @Ferret, GreenC, and Oddjob84: about your needless and senseless use of {{linkrot}}. It's your job to fill in the links (WP:REFILL), and not to put warnings on a minority or nonexistent issue. Stop doing this, and go back and undo it immediately. This is disruptive editing and users can be blocked for this.Smuckola(talk) 07:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And then you just did it again. — Smuckola(talk) 09:30, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Doomdorm64. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible script error

[edit]

This edit broke a citation, apparently with some sort of script or semi-automated tool. Can you please fix the script and run it again? Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blimey!

[edit]

Good point here - you're not kidding! I might try and have a go later and reduce the current, ludicrous, list - or hope that someone else steps in and does so before I get round to it. Thanks and happy editing, DBaK (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Doomdorm64. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Doomdorm64. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Colin Murdoch (voice actor), from its old location at User:Doomdorm64/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 10:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Colin Murdoch (voice actor) (December 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sam Sailor 10:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering(t) 12:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stereotypes of Canadians listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stereotypes of Canadians. Since you had some involvement with the Stereotypes of Canadians redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 13:36, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian stereotypes listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Canadian stereotypes. Since you had some involvement with the Canadian stereotypes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 13:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requirements for the perennial sources list

[edit]

Hi Doomdorm64, thanks for contributing entries for TV Tropes and Bulbapedia to the perennial sources list! I'd like to tell you about two rules that we follow when we edit the list:

  1. We can only add sources that are perennially discussed. At a minimum, sources should have at least two discussions or a request for comment on the reliable sources noticeboard before they can be added to the list. You can use the search box on the noticeboard to find past discussions.
  2. Please make sure the list stays in alphabetical order.

Since TV Tropes was discussed twice on the reliable sources noticeboard, I've indexed the two discussions and moved it between Tunefind and Us Weekly to keep the list in alphabetical order. However, since Bulbapedia was only discussed once on the reliable sources noticeboard, it doesn't quite meet the requirement to stay in the list, and I've removed it accordingly. Please feel free to ask me or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Noticeboard if you have any questions. Thanks! — Newslinger talk 11:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Doomdorm64! Thanks for ensuring that articles are supported by reliable sources. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles.

If you would like to participate, please visit WikiProject Reliability for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Participants". Thanks! — Newslinger talk 11:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 10:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yankophile listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yankophile. Since you had some involvement with the Yankophile redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 00:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Contrasting and categorization of emotions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Discard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stereotypes of Canadians for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stereotypes of Canadians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereotypes of Canadians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Moxy 🍁 20:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fire ghost listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fire ghost. Since you had some involvement with the Fire ghost redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 04:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wall ghost listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wall ghost. Since you had some involvement with the Wall ghost redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 04:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Japanese ghost) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Japanese ghost.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

This, however, is a good redirect, because it clearly identifies a context (Japanese mythology), and points at an article that serves as a reasonable introduction to the subject.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 04:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant monster listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Elephant monster. Since you had some involvement with the Elephant monster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 04:38, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lava demon listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lava demon. Since you had some involvement with the Lava demon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 04:44, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Winged lizard listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Winged lizard. Since you had some involvement with the Winged lizard redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 04:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost dragon listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ghost dragon. Since you had some involvement with the Ghost dragon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 04:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doomdorm64. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Colin Murdoch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 14:55, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Contrasting and categorization of emotions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tolerance, Sorrow, Vengeance, Fury, Shock, Misery, Scorn, Fright, Conflict, Elation, Dread, Doom and Aversion

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-American" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-American. Since you had some involvement with the Non-American redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Britishfinance (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-Brit" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-Brit. Since you had some involvement with the Non-Brit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Britishfinance (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-Canadian" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-Canadian. Since you had some involvement with the Non-Canadian redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Britishfinance (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-Australian" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-Australian. Since you had some involvement with the Non-Australian redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Britishfinance (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"List of generation IX Pokémon" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of generation IX Pokémon. Since you had some involvement with the List of generation IX Pokémon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"List of generation X Pokémon" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of generation X Pokémon. Since you had some involvement with the List of generation X Pokémon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Encouraged" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Encouraged. Since you had some involvement with the Encouraged redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 05:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Australia's Canada" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Australia's Canada. Since you had some involvement with the Australia's Canada redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Cambrophile" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cambrophile. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 18#Cambrophile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Unnatural green" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Unnatural green. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 13#Unnatural green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beyblade L-Drago.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beyblade L-Drago.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The file you uploaded File:Beyblade L-Drago.jpg is not copyrighted and therefore the licence on the file was changed to PD-ineligible. --Empire of Grammar (talk) 03:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Empire of Grammar: hey there, awesome job at finding a superior image and license situation if that's true, but that image is completely different so you cant just upload over it. You must revert what you did and re-upload it anew, and let the nonfree one be deleted. — Smuckola(talk) 04:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mega Gengar.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mega Gengar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Knight Holy Grail.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Black Knight Holy Grail.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Frozenness" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Frozenness and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 4#Frozenness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Multi-headed dragon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Multi-headed dragon until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please have a look also at the information at this page, which appears every time you edit J. K. Rowling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 10:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Australia page

[edit]

Hello there I reverted your edits regarding minority rights in Australia because they were randomly inserted into the article the sources didn't support the content. The Guardian article you cited doesn't say that "Australia is one of the highest ranked countries in the world for LGBT equality." The statement "the majority of Australians support same sex marriage" has nothing to do with the Health care system. If you want to add information about same-sex marriage etc. please go onto the Talk page and see consensus for your proposed additions. Please do not reinstate content that has been reverted by another. The relevent policy is here. Happy to discuss on Talk page. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:03, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for the clarification. Doomdorm64 (talk) 07:58, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

equaldex.com = WP:SELFPUBLISH

[edit]

equaldex.com = WP:SELFPUBLISH Moxy- 12:15, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Raladic. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pride flag, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Raladic (talk) 20:56, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I’ll be more careful with referencing in future. Thank you. --Doomdorm64 (talk) 21:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Cordless Larry (talk) 08:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Finland, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Changing geographical definition without support from RS despite recent notices about not using references. TylerBurden (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So your being reversed all over!

[edit]

What should you do!.....pls review Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Be aware that Wikipedia:Advocacy edits related to Wikipedia:Main article fixation has been discussed about your recent edits. Moxy- 21:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i.e = Talk:New Zealand#Misuse of article Moxy- 21:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to start an edit war, just surprised that my addition to the article got reverted. I'll be more careful when adding LGBT-related topics in the future. Doomdorm64 (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't about being LBQ, it was about the way the information fitted into the wider article, and to a lesser extent, the quality of a couple of the sources. Anyway, all good now and time to move on. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Truss

[edit]

You need to use shortened footnotes when adding refs in that article. See Template:sfn for more details. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 15:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just fixed the formatting on there. Doomdorm64 (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, nice to have competent ref editors around. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Guinea-Malabo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 16 § Guinea-Malabo until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:48, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Autiphobia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Autiphobia until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beyblade L-Drago.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beyblade L-Drago.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull. Thank you. The WordsmithTalk to me 02:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bold partial title matches

[edit]

This edit is in direct conflict with the Manual of Style, specifically the section MOS:BOLDAVOID. Please self-revert. Thanks in advance. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 12:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I now see that you have done this in many articles. I reverted a couple; please take care of the others (but especially Russia, since that article is semi-protected). Thanks. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 13:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disappointing that you did not respond despite editing since my message. I've cleaned up most of the stylistic damage you've done in the past week, but the pages on Russia and Uganda are semi-protected, so I can't. Hopefully you will do it yourself. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 14:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you've made those changes (and corrected a typo of mine) -- thank you. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You’re welcome, thanks Doomdorm64 (talk) 08:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been warned before about adding unsourced content, as you have again done here. That's not only unsourced but highly POV. Please edit with more respect for Wikipedia's neutrality. Bishonen | tålk 12:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry, I'll be more careful with my wording in the future. Thank you. Doomdorm64 (talk) 16:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect LGBT rights in Mzansi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 29 § LGBT rights in Mzansi until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 04:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Forced-birther has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 11 § Forced-birther until a consensus is reached. RockstoneSend me a message! 07:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on United States

[edit]

Hi Doomdorm64: please don't mark disruptive edits, like your edit on United States as minor. If you want to make changes to that section of the Introduction, please discuss it at Talk:United States first to gain a new consensus. That particular paragraph has been the subject of a lot of consensus building over the years. Thanks! -- RockstoneSend me a message! 09:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I apologise for not discussing that before making changes. Thank you Doomdorm64 (talk) 16:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Same-sex marriage in Aland has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 25 § Same-sex marriage in Aland until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Same-sex marriage in Tenerife has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 25 § Same-sex marriage in Tenerife until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect LGBT rights in Zealand has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 26 § LGBT rights in Zealand until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 03:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Xth state to legalize same-sex marriage"

[edit]

Ok, so Local laws prior to Obergefell v. Hodges shows California was the third state to legalize. I think it introduces confusion saying that Washington was the seventh state to legalize, when it's the eighth with California included. I understand that Prop 8 made it illegal again, but it was still fully legalized for half a year. I think adding this numerical trivia muddies the waters with competing definitions of legalize. Especially when you have the problem of date of decision vs. effective date. As far as trivia goes, I think the fact that Washington was the first state to legalize via referendum is more notable anyway. TheSavageNorwegian 15:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I re-added the part, amending it to say Washington was the eighth jurisdiction to legalise same-sex marriage overall and the seventh state to do so (including DC). Is this acceptable? Doomdorm64 (talk) 17:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I'm just wondering where you're getting seventh from? It's the eighth state by my count and ninth including D.C. TheSavageNorwegian 18:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
California legalised same-sex marriage in 2008, banned it, and re-legalised it years later, so Washington is counted one place earlier. I hope this makes things clearer, thanks in advance. Doomdorm64 (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is my point, it's inaccurate to say Washington is eighth since California did legalize before them. No one is making you add this specific factoid seemingly designed to be some type of wrong, we don't have to do this.
I think of it this way: William Henry Harrison is the ninth U.S. President, despite having held the office for 31 days. Likewise, Grover Cleveland is the 22nd and 24th President. An argument could be made that California is the 2nd and 11th state to legalize. Do you see what I'm saying? It's open-ended how to interpret this list. Especially since if you go by the date of the ruling instead of effective date, then the order becomes different again, and Washington is tied for 9th place with two other states. The only information I'd feel comfortable sharing in the lead of Washington is that it was among the first states to legalize same-sex marriage, and the first to do so via referendum. TheSavageNorwegian 21:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Russia;s anti-LGBT law has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 26 § Russia;s anti-LGBT law until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 19:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to New Hampshire. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 10 § Straggler LGBT categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]