User talk:Doodledude1369

March 2014

Hello, I'm Turgan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Andrew Rutherford, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Turgan ^Talk 15:59, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sweater. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sweater was changed by Doodledude1369 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940358 on 2014-03-04T16:01:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Night at the Museum, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Night at the Museum was changed by Doodledude1369 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965564 on 2014-03-04T16:05:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Turgan. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lol limewire

Hello Doodledude1369,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lol limewire for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 16:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lian cungcin

Hello Doodledude1369,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lian cungcin for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lol limewire

Hello Doodledude1369,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lol limewire for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]