User talk:Donttellmewhattodo69

Speedy deletion nomination of No Panty

Hello Donttellmewhattodo69,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged No Panty for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 03:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Joell Ortiz. Block evasion by User:MusicLover650. Binksternet (talk) 03:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Playboi Carti. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry about that revert earlier—hope you have a nice time editing otherwise! RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 00:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rtjfan. Thank you. 153.175.145.206 (talk) 05:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mac Miller production discography. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:49, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of No Mountains in Manhattan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article No Mountains in Manhattan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Mountains in Manhattan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dysklyver 22:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Playboi Carti discography

The article Playboi Carti discography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article not meeting notability criteria created by a user subsequently blocked for sockpuppetry. delete as per WP:DENY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]