User talk:Donsmokem

Welcome!

Hello, Donsmokem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco 08:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Drug-eluting stent has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Werdan7^{T @} 01:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Drug-eluting stent. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This edit summary is not appropriate. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 01:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Drug-eluting stent. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 01:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've made some pretty big changes to the Drug-eluting stent. While everyone is invited to be bold, it looks like User:Orangemarlin disagrees with your changes. I recommend discussing on the talk page, rather than continuing to edit war. Thanks--Werdan7^{T @} 01:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the editor has chosen to own the article rather than develop it with a team of editors. We're even trying to construct a manual of style for medical device articles to parallel the pharmaceutical and medical articles. But of course, when someone owns the article, it's hard to develop this. I'll wait until Donsmokem goes back to something else, and I'll clean it up with a team of editors that likes to work together rather than run amok. I'm done here. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 03:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marlin, it is quite frustrating for me to spend the effort at cleaning up a disorganized piece, adding important references, and balancing with NPOV content -- then you repeatedly undo, deleting my contribution and that of others, resetting to a really particularly messy old version. May I request that rather than object to my editorial effort as "ownership", you address my version of Mar 12 2008 on a topic by topic basis? Please do not reset to that tired old version again. Thank you. Donsmokem (talk) 16:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate action

I saw that you asked what other courses of action could be taken in scenarios like this, and although I can't say what would be suitable for you, of course, I can tell you what was suitable for me. I also recently had a run-in like this where marlin reverted everything I did, so after asking around, I made a post here, asking for input or asking for an admin to tell marlin to stop, I added this to the talk page of the article in question, and, although it never came to it, I was preparing to ask an admin to block marlin from editing the page given his poor etiquette. I also assembled a central body of evidence against him if I were to have to ask that he be blocked entirely from medicine articles, though fortunately it never came to that. I also told marlin to get off my talk page because all he was doing was giving me stupid warning (like the ones above). Again, I can't say what's best, especially given that marlin appears to have stopped editing the page about stents, but just for future reference, I hope you find these helpful. My entire experience with marlin and a couple others really woke me up as to how much POV accredited editors like him with multiple awards can have. I used to sparodically edit articles that were totally non-controversial, but as soon as you go near political articles or economic articles like these, it goes downhill very quickly. Oh yeah, and the article that I had a problem with is Aids, though marlin gave up a while ago.Merechriolus (talk) 21:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Donsmokem. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Albert Pacifico for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert Pacifico is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Pacifico until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Donsmokem. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]