User talk:Donovyegg

April 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to FIFA World Cup official mascots have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: FIFA World Cup official mascots was changed by Donovyegg (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950583 on 2022-04-01T16:56:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Airbus A380, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sourced data should not be changed without adding a new source to back the change. Rosbif73 (talk) 19:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2024 U.S. Presidential Election

Please stop going back and forth with your spamming. No need to get into any unnecessary arguments. Lostfan333 (talk) 19:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Wikipedia documents what is reported in reliable sources. It isn't here to reflect what you wish to be true. Please don't make any further edits to advance your own political point of view. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 03:04, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Titanic II, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Blue Riband► 11:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Boom Overture, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 19:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English

I'm always need to edit and fix articles that need to add more detail, or just remove anything that just happened

To contribute to the English Wikipedia productively, You'm always need to learn to write English better.

The text you added to 2024 United States presidential election was grammatically incorrect, and had to be corrected by another editor. I added a Wikipedia:Babel tag to your userpage, guessing your English level is basic, which means you understand English "well enough to understand written material or simple questions". It's a courtesy to other editors to use your userpage to let them know this. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2024 United States presidential election

With regard to mentioning in the lead that Trump's running mate in 2024 "may not be Mike Pence", you commented, "let me keep it here because he might announce his new running mate after the 2022 midterms, just like he did after the 2018 midtirms". However, (1) Trump didn't announce a new running mate after the 2018 midterm elections. Rather, he kept the same running mate. He didn't have to do a search and interview potential candidates because Pence was already there and at the time Trump and Pence were willing to run again together. To my knowledge Trump has not been actively looking for a VP candidate for 2024 yet. (Compare 2016 Republican Party vice presidential candidate selection#Vetting process and selection.) (2) We shouldn't write our lead based on what we think Trump "might announce" in the near future when he hasn't said that he is going to announce a running mate soon, and he wouldn't have to announce it until July 2024 if he is the nominee. (3) If Trump were to select his running mate this month, he might run the risk that other potential VP choices could endorse a different candidate for the 2024 nomination in hopes that the other candidate might select them as a running mate. So it could be in his interest to defer selection of a running mate until he clinches the nomination.

Of course, I could be wrong and Trump might announce a running mate soon, but in that case that would be factual information (not just speculation) and it would belong in the article's lead paragraph. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Loiseaulybre. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Titanic II, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. L'Oiseau Lybre (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at YouTube, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wracking ^💬 17:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flatulence. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wracking ^💬 17:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning for adding material without using reliable sources

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright articles

"their content cannot be copied freely Creative Commons license or with permission" -- This makes no sense. "Creative commons license" is out of place in the sentence. "Or with permission" is inaccurate; under copyright law, a work can always be copied when the copyright holder is able to give permission and gives it. You don't seem to know what you're doing in these articles. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be upset. It is possible to make changes with good intentions, but still be reverted, because the changes had issues that you weren't aware of. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hi Donovyegg! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of All rights reserved several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:All rights reserved, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 19:51, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on All rights reserved. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 16:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Your changes on the following pages were reverted due to the addition of incorrect English grammar:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intel_Core&diff=prev&oldid=1156472663
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MacBook_Pro&diff=prev&oldid=1156041210
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_rights_reserved&diff=prev&oldid=1156273594
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copyright&diff=prev&oldid=1156060157
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_A._Edison_High_School_(Fairfax_County,_Virginia)&diff=prev&oldid=1153241483
79.244.58.167 (talk) 11:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trademark&diff=prev&oldid=1156561637 TJRC (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Please stop making grammatically incorrect changes as you have to the following articles, which have all been reverted by other editors:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_DeSantis_2024_presidential_campaign&diff=prev&oldid=1156807547
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MacBook&diff=prev&oldid=1156996305
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MacBook&diff=prev&oldid=1156996442
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mac_Pro&diff=prev&oldid=1157000695
79.244.58.167 (talk) 18:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on All rights reserved. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 02:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at All rights reserved. TJRC (talk) 02:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop making factually and grammatically incorrect changes as you have to the following article, which has been reverted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Apple_Inc._media_events&diff=prev&oldid=1158719826
79.244.58.167 (talk) 09:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop making factually and/or grammatically incorrect changes as you have to the following article, which has been reverted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tesla_Cybertruck&diff=prev&oldid=1161904921
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Independence_Day_(United_States)&diff=prev&oldid=1162859152
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christmas_in_July&diff=prev&oldid=1162893265
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flying_car&diff=prev&oldid=1163210264

Your recent editing history at All_rights_reserved shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_rights_reserved&diff=prev&oldid=1162392548
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_rights_reserved&diff=prev&oldid=1162392854
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_rights_reserved&diff=prev&oldid=1163091831

Your recent editing history at Trademark shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trademark&diff=prev&oldid=1163096671
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trademark&diff=prev&oldid=1163096725
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trademark&diff=prev&oldid=1163096990
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trademark&diff=prev&oldid=1163097083
79.244.55.54 (talk) 17:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 79.244.55.54 (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lourdes 08:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you start communicating with other editors, you will not be able to edit here. Collaboration and responding to queries are prime requirements here. If you think you are ready to collaborate genuinely, please use the template above to request an unblock and any administrator can unblock you without checking with me. Thank you, Lourdes 08:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]