Jump to content

User talk:Donjon388

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2019

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:57, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 19:40, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Donjon388 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was warned once and stopped n read rules. This is most certainly not a vandalism only acct! I had made the same edit on 3 relatives pages. As soon as I was warned I apologized and have contacted the admins in this case. When I get warned, then stop editing all together for a bit I don't expect to be blocked when I come back... That's totally not fair. I've read the rules now. I know what can and can't be edited. I run Several Huge Discord servers and I know being an admin can be frustrating and we want to auto assume ppl are trolls right off the bat... My intentions are nothing but good on here. Please unblock me, and at least let me put the warning I got to good use! Don Jones 20:51, 12 August 2019 (UTC)) DonJon388 12 August 2019 (UTC) (tag K6ka)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately many people say they know what can and can't be edited when actually they don't. Please explain in your own words why your edits were inappropriate and what edits we can expect from you if unblocked. Huon (talk) 21:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Your first (and only) warning was issued to you on 18:57. You continued to edit until 19:12, without making any apologies as you have claimed. Additionally, you haven't addressed the reasons for your block in that you haven't explained any of your problematic edits. Your claim that you run several huge Discord servers means nothing to us; focus on your actions on Wikipedia. Also, sending me a friend request over Discord is unacceptable; it suggests you're stalking me on the Internet and I will not support an unblock in such a case. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:03, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Donjon388 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Man, this messaging interface is kind of confusing. You have your discord handle posted on your talk page andd invite people to contact you. I thought that would be a much better way of communicating. I've never had to msg people on Wiki. Def wasn't trying to stalk you... I edited things on Ghislaine Maxwell's siblings page. I also edited a portion on Operation London Bridge... I thought I was posting news for ppl to read. I see that those were problematic because it's speculation. I knew nothing about vandalism and all of this... I'm using my personal IP and account linked to my main email. I would def not intentionally break the rules and vandalize with my info on here if I thought it was vandalizing. I know where I messed up. The person apologizeded to was Cobi. I thought he was who blocked me. He's just the Bot Owner I assume. So now I'll apologize to you. I never want to make someone's job harder. From now on my edits will be properly sourced, factual links, or mistakes I notice that I can verify. Im a 36 year old mature adult. I do alot of IT work, I'm also a Music Producer, Manager, Videographer that works with alot of artists I may need to add to my clients pages at some point... Sourcing valid factual links that give someone more info. There's alot of stuff for UT Vols players thats incorrect. I know that for fact. So on something like that I'd update to current true info, and link news/articles/etc backing up my claims. I may need to add to my clients pages at some point... That's 100% not me. I def see where I messed up, and I will not do it ever again. Honest too God. Don Jones 21:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)) DonJon388 16:21, 12 August 2019 (CST) (talk) (talk)Don Jones 21:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You posted statements like, "So who knows atm, the entire Maxwell family and a royal connection could all die on the 18th of this month." and "LONDON BRIDGE IS FALLING DOWN... Keep your eyes peeled." And, your claim in this unblock request is that you thought you were "posting news for ppl to read". That doesn't seem remotely believable to me. You also say that you intend to create articles on your clients, or update existing articles about your clients. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a vehicle for promotion of your clients (see WP:NOTPROMOTION). There are also massive problems with conflicts of interest when you write about subjects that you are personally involved with, especially people that are paying you for your services. I don't see any evidence that you're here to actually contribute to an encyclopedia. At best, you're here to promote your clients. At worst, you're here to post more vandalism. Either way, unblock request denied. ‑Scottywong| yak _ 00:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.