Jump to content

User talk:Donald Trung/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

Letter to the Vietnamese History Museum 🏛

On March 1st, 2018 I had contacted the Vietnamese History Museum 🏛 if they were to donate information on their exhibitions to Wikipedia, I am (currently) still awaiting an answer. This post is only for record keeping. --Donald Trung 💴 (No fake news 📜) (Articles 📚) Respect mobile users. 📲 03:11, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: February 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 7 | Issue 2 | February 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue
From the Community

WikiProject Engineering Workshop at IIUC,Chittagong

What did we learn from Wikibridges MOOC?

Wikimedia Serbia launched Wiki scholar project

Wiki Club in Ohrid, Macedonia

Karvachar’s WikiClub: When getting knowledge is cool

More than 30 new courses launched in the University of the Basque Country

Review meeting on Christ Wikipedia Education Program

The Multidisciplinary Choices of High School Students: The Arabic Education Program; Wikimedia Israel

From the Education Team

The Education Extension is being deprecated (second call)

The 2017 survey report live presentation is available for viewing

A page you started (Khải Định Thông Bảo) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Khải Định Thông Bảo, Donald Trung!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed, very well done!

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 03:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you 😊, but that'll be my last article for a long time, I'm glad you liked it. --Donald Trung 💴 (No fake news 📜) (Articles 📚) Respect mobile users. 📲 03:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Collaboration products newsletter: 2018-02

Latest news from the Wikimedia Global Collaboration team, about Map improvements 2018, Notifications, Structured discussions and Edit Review Improvements. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.

What's new?

  • Collaboration and Language are now going their way separately. Updates about Content Translation are not included in this newsletter anymore. Please refer to the Language report.
  • Collaboration has a new project: Map improvements 2018.
    • The team’s engagement with maps is based on 2017 Community Wishlist proposal Kartographer Improvements, though the work won’t be restricted to items named there.
    • The project is currently in its very early research and planning stages.
    • It has a limited term that’s scheduled to conclude at the end of June 2018.

Edit Review Improvements [More information • Help pages]

Recent changes

Problems

  • The explanation of the abbreviations on the recent changes page could overlap with the list of changes. This has been fixed. [5][6]
  • On Related changes it was not possible to use Saved filters for several articles. It has been fixed. [7]
  • Transclude special:relatedchanges on a subpage removed #contentSub. This is now fixed. [8]

Notifications [More information • Help pages]

Recent changes

  • The wording when you send a thanks message has changed. Instead of Yes or No it says Thank and Cancel. It is also now easier to understand that all thanks are public. [9]
  • A notification is now sent to account owner on multiple unsuccessful login attempts. [10]

Problems

  • Between week 7 and 20 February, when you thanked someone for an edit, the thank went to the latest unthanked edit to that page. It didn't matter which edit you tried to give thanks for. This has been fixed. [11]
  • Long page titles on Special:Notifications were not truncated. This is now fixed. [12]

Structured discussions [More information • Help pages]

Recent changes

  • You can now press CTRL + ENTER to post a new message. [13]
  • It wasn't possible to create a description of a Structured discussions board. This has been fixed. [14]

Problems

  • On wikis using the Beta feature, it is not possible to enable or disable Structured discussion from the Beta page. However, admins can create and move the pages.

Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

11:29, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #302

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Re-enable Wikidata Recent Changes integration on Russian Wikipedia (phab:T179012)
    • Investigate on the size of logging table (phab:T188635)
    • Fix issues with graph vizualisation UI (phab:T186467)
    • Work on results of security review for the deployment of Wikibase-Lexeme (phab:T186726)
    • Enable constraint result caching on Wikidata (phab:T184812)

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here.


Tech News: 2018-10

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • You can now make longer edit summaries. [15]

Changes later this week

  • You can notify users in edit summaries. They will get a ping just as if they had been mentioned on a wiki page. [16]
  • On Special:AbuseLog you can now choose to list only actions that actually made an edit. Other actions are when the filter warned the editor or blocked the edit from being made. There are also more search options. [17][18]
  • Advanced item Wikis can enable Citoid to provide automatic reference look-up in the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor, but it is complex. The tool will now warn in the JavaScript console if the configuration isn't correct. Soon Citoid will disable itself if the configuration isn't correct. Check that your wiki is configured correctly. You can ask for help if you need it. [19]
  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 March. It will be on all wikis from 8 March (calendar).

Meetings

  • Recurrent item You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 6 March at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
  • Advanced item You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 7 March at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

17:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Notice.

Until March 2018 I will probably not be active here, if you wish 🌠 to leave me a message please do so here, I will regularly check back some articlesㄨ but will mostly only read Wikipedia. --Donald Trung 💴 (No fake news 📜) (Articles 📚) Respect mobile users. 📲 19:47, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Change your signature

Images are explicitly not allowed in signatures per WP:SIGIMAGE. They put an unnecessary drain on server resources. Please change it immediately. --Majora (talk) 00:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@Majora: concerning this comment "Considering part of their unblock involved emojis and other images and DoRD already asked them to knock it off with the images in their signatures I'm bringing this here for further community review. At the very least, Donald Trung has to go back and clean up the massive mess they have made on so many talk pages across the project. Putting unnecessary resources into showing their signatures just because they had to have images in it. --Majora (talk) 01:05, 6 March 2018 (UTC)" I didn't include images but templates in my signature and the large signature was changed the moment I saw that it was several thousand bytes into a smaller one, I was forbidden from using non-Unicode characters but {{Smiley|}} is fully in Unicode but simply displays as smileys (not emoji's), and why are users like @Koavf: allowed to use emoji's in their signature, but not me? If I could simply use emoji's like 🛠 these there would've been no issue, the original block had nothing to do with me (mis)using emoji's, and they simply make my signature more recognisable so I can pick up where I left more easily in a long thread. As for using that "disruptive" signature I had already changed it yesterday after I saw how big it was so this block isn't preventative at all. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 06:38, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Donald Trung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not use images in my signature including smaller images like the ones, I will request the ability to use emoji's in my signature in the future, but will not try to find a replacement before appealing that condition. I didn't know that templates were images and changed my signature the moment I was alerted to it. If the concern was about the 3,500 bytes signature then know that at User:Donald Trung/Signature Testing Space I had changed it the moment I became aware of how big it is and changed it into a smaller one. That using smiley templates was against the rules is something I was simply unaware of at that time. Or more specifically that the way the smiley template gets displayed are considered images. I have read the policy on signatures before changing it and didn't think that templates were images, I am mistaken and request that it should at least be taken into consideration that the signature at had when I got blocked was significantly smaller than the one of 3,500 bytes--Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 1:55 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Sorry no, if you had properly read the policy you would have found that templates are not appropriate in signatures either. Signatures cannot have templates, files, or be longer than 255 characters. Signatures must link back to the user, and not be ridiculously long when rendered. Signatures must be readable and not disrupt text formatting.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 15:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will not repeat this mistake, I have thoroughly read the policy and know what I did wrong, but I don't see how a wrong signature would require a a full site ban, I was writing articles again and busy expanding articles like Manchukuo yuan, I will accept a ban from all talk pages if neededAnd I wasn't "trolling" with my comment about Slowking4, I just thought that blocks should be a preventative measure to protect the encyclopedia and saw how helpful he is on other projects and hopes that he can return here, but he clearly isn't interested in appealing his ban. Also I thought that the village pump was a talk page as it's where Wikipedia policy gets discussed. . --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 23:34, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Donald Trung's emoji signatures. Majora (talk) 01:05, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Donald, if you wish to make a statement concerning that discussion, place it below and someone will copy it over for you. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 03:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

I am just curious as to why using emoji's in my signature is forbidden while there are users like Koavf that have signatures that display like this ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 21:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC) while using emoji'shad absolutely nothing to do with my original block, and wasn't even considered to be disruptive prior. I had only used the large signature three or four times and immediately changed it after I saw how big it was which can be seen here to find a signature that wasn't so large but didn't contain emoji's but templates as 🕷 this is an emoji and {{Smiley|}} is a template, something which I wasn't prohibited from using. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 06:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Commenting on the discussion

@Ansh666: I have never had communication issues regarding the content of articles, I had a copyright strike while editing as an IP and accidentally placed a blacklisted link which was discussed and allowed to stay, I will refrain from commenting on any policies and my behaviour on Meta was related to the fact that my signature included a link to my global lock and unlock which I stated was there to give hope to others who are locked that they could be unlocked but was seen as disruptive so I changed it after a discussion, as for the disruptive voting I fully know what I did was wrong and clearly haven't repeated it here, I asked if I could change my votes to neutral but was denied. I'm not sure why you don't want me to write and improve articles, though as I've had followed every policy correctly and improved my style if corrected.

And yes, in retrospect I should've simply opened a RfC regarding the usage and appeal of global locks or try to get a global UTRS implemented instead of my votes, I know fully well how disruptive it was and lead myself get wrongfully guided by emotion instead of rationally trying to follow policy and implement change that way. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) I am a mobile user. 09:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

For violating the terms you agreed to before being unblocked, in spirit if not in letter, I have reinstated your block. You are surely aware that edits like this, with a nearly 3500 byte, image-laden signature, are disruptive, so I have concluded that the English Wikipedia isn't a good fit for you. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:59, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@DoRD: I added templates as you stated that I could still use emoji's on talk pages as village pumps, Etc. Are talk pages, then you requested that I had removed the emoji's from my signature so I did, I replaced them with templates (not images) which,I couldn't find was against any policy. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 05:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

And other users like Koavf, Etc. have emoji's in their signatures, my original block had nothing to do with the (mis)use of emoji's so as an unblock condition it didn't make sense but you said I was allowed to use them in talk pages and my own user pages. I am not sure why only I specifically am not allowed to use emoji's in my signature as it isn't considered disruptive for Koavf/Justin Knapp. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 05:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Why not allow me to have three emoji's in my signature like this? And what I used were templates which are explicitly not emoji's. I mostly prefer something coloured so I can see where I commented in a long discussion so I can pick up a thread from there. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 05:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

And concerning the above edit, the moment I saw how big my signature was I changed it to {{smiley|}} based one. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 05:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, in so far as enhancing signature visibility goes, I've colorized mine.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
But a few simple emoji's are more easily recognisable, also after clicking edit because you would have to search for your name, meanwhile Koavf can simply see a heart and a peace symbol without having to really search for anything. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 06:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Concerning "You are surely aware that edits like this, with a nearly 3500 byte, image-laden signature, are disruptive, so I have concluded that the English Wikipedia isn't a good fit for you." I had literally changed that large signature the moment I saw how big it was, the {{Smiley|}} is only 430 bytes which isn't even that big, and that is the signature I got blocked for, not the one I had already changed. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 06:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: as you are a part of the AN/I discussion and everyone else seems to be asleep. Comments? --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 10:53, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@DoRD: and @Dlohcierekim: I was under the mistaken impression that the village pump was a talk page per "I would say that any page which is used for discussions (including this one, AN, etc.) is a talk page; any other sort of Wikipedia: namespace page should generally not be signed. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)" and I should've cleaned up the large signatures myself, I would also like to apologise to Dlohcierekim if he/she feels that I've caused them embarrassment by violating any unblock conditions. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 01:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry things did not work out.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:01, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
@Dlohcierekim: do you see any unblock where I am only confined to articles and article related talk pages with my current signature? I was in the middle of updating years because an old source used the wrong dates and I would rather no see any hoaxes, I fully understand that the community doesn't want any actors that disagree with how their policies are implemented so I will refrain from talking in "Wikipedia:" Spaces but request to be allowed to comment in Articles for Deletion. And of course user talk pages to solely discuss article content or maybe give compliments to users that deserve it, but I'll stay away from controversial contributors. --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 03:21, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I do not know. The An/I discussion is moving slowly. You might read that to see what has been said. I would simplify the signature further-- remove the superfluous. You might want to ping DorD and see if current sig is acceptable. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
@Donald Trung: Email received. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Signature

@DoRD: How about I ask you on your user page every time I wish to change my signature (which won't be that often or at all as I mostly just want a link to the list of articles I've created recently)? I genuinely did not see how large my previous signature was until it was too late, I would've cleaned up the mess myself if anyone would've asked. Is my current signature acceptable?

Note that the "No fake news" part is a joke inspired by a real life event where someone made that joke based on the written form of my name (Trung is actually pronounced like Chüng), and only serves to lighten the mood.--Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 03:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

@Dlohcierekim: I changed the "Respect mobile users" to this signature as it might help clarify why I would take two edits to move something from one section to another, if wanted I would remove that part entirely. Is there anything else you would like to suggest? --Donald Trung (No fake news) (Articles) I am a mobile user. 08:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

No, I think if it's now acceptable to Iridescent then that's how it needs to be.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

@Dlohcierekim: Do you think that it is possible to get unblocked for a week with the conditions listed below that what lead to the block is behind me and then have another discussion opened where people can evaluate, and yes I fully understand that if given this chance to prove myself that a breach of it will also lead to an immediate and indefinite ban from the project. I have not made a single disruptive edit in any of the spaces laid forth by those conditions and only wish to prove that they should have no doubt in believing that an unblock will only be beneficial for Wikipedia. --Donald Trung (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

I do not know as I have not followed he ANI thread.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Donald_Trung/Archive_3&oldid=830337470"