Jump to content

User talk:Don Argus jr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Museums in NY

[edit]

Thanks for adding and correcting the regions listing for the museums in NY! It's a big help and makes the list more usable. Jllm06 (talk) 16:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upstate New York

[edit]

Hey- I'm a native 4th generation Central New Yorker (Liverpool, NY all my life) and most of the people I know pronounce coneys as coneys. There are a few people I know who pronounce it cooneys, but it is by no means the only pronunciation- nor, from my experience, the majority pronunciation (I'd say roughly 3/4 of the people I know say coney and the other 1/4 say cooney). I think either pronunciation is generally accepted (although sometimes debated at barbecues) and to simply say "pronounced cooneys" is not accurate whatsoever as it basically comes down to personal preference. I would therefore like to see the Upstate New York article say "sometimes pronounced cooney" or "pronounced by some as cooney" to be more factual and reflect the actual truth of the situation.


Hey- thanks for writing. I too grew up in Liverpool, and when as an adult I lived on the North Side of Syracuse I was the sixth generation of my family to do so. Among people I know in CNY, the pronunciation depends on where one was raised; if one moved to the area from away, that person would probably say "cone-ee" (incorrectly in my view), but natives say "cooney." Now you go and shoot that theory down!
I have put the question to both Heid's and Hoffman Sausages. We'll see what they have to say.
Cheers,
Don
Hi Don, Born and raised in Syracuse (2nd generation) and the word was always cone-ee. I could never figure Syracuse out though because half the people have one accent, and the other half have a completely different accent. Kind of the Saracuse crowd versus the Siracuse crowd! Regards Nconwaymicelli (talk) 07:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gosh, what day is it!! Nconwaymicelli (talk) 07:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Days and Months in Song

[edit]

The article Days and Months in Song has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be WP:LC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kinu t/c 05:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Days and Months in Song

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Days and Months in Song, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Days and Months in Song. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kinu t/c 02:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Yo[reply]

Hi, Don, thanks for your note. Those upstate towns are interesting places. You asked a good question, but I didn't check all the linked pages - just knew that WIKI style is to have just brief info on lists of people like that. All the content is there on the Pompey history page if others want to check it against each of the linked articles on the people. The Sweet brothers seemed quite outstanding and may deserve an article on the family as a whole; maybe they're notable in the area with all three of them. I've seen a few others like that.Parkwells (talk) 16:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Upstate New York Legends and Hoaxes

[edit]

Yes, I agree, but I took it out only to clean up the article. A short list of the most notable of the hoaxes and legends would be OK. Can you get a citation to Weird New York or other reliable sources? Bearian (talk) 16:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The four mentioned constitute such a short list of the most notable, IMO. I took a look at "Weird New York;" i dunno - it doesn't seem authoritative to me (no citations there). I'll look for other outside citations for the four items. Thanks again for your rescue work on this article. Don Argus jr (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, a separate article on the politics is good. I recently heard a great story (no cite): Senator X from Queens calls Warren Anderson in Binghamton and says, "Howyadooin! I'm in Platsboig. Can I stop by and seeya for lunch?" LOL. Bearian (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sheesh! I'd love to collect citations for these stories. Don Argus jr (talk) 22:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Journalists from Upstate New York

[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Journalists from Upstate New York. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of people from New York#Art/literature/journalism/philosophy. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of people from New York#Art/literature/journalism/philosophy - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 04:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Innovation and Business in Upstate New York has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think that this is a csd, but it should be merged with the inventors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Old Al (Talk) 04:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Don Argus and thank you for your contribution. I do have some questions about this article. Where did this list come from? What is the definition of "Upstate New York"? Would this list not be very large if completed? Herostratus (talk) 14:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. If its a spinoff from another article, that's OK with me; I was concerned that you had just made it up. I don't have an opinion on list vs. category. I think for large entities its maybe a good idea to have both. In any case, your list gives considerable info on many entries that a category could not give, so its fine as a list. Cheers, and thanks again for your contributions! PS: Don't forget to sign your talk page posts with four tildes (~~~~) Herostratus (talk) 04:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NYS Museum listing suggestion

[edit]

DIRT (Drivers Independent Race Tracks) Hall of Fame and Classic Car Museum - Thanks for the listing, I added it as the Northeast Modified Hall of Fame & Classic Car Museum. It seems to have different names and is difficult to pin down visiting information.Jllm06 (talk) 14:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

[edit]

Hello, Don Argus jr! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charles Bierstadt has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Minima© (talk) 06:32, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gee whiz, the man has been dead over a hundred years, as the article already said.Don Argus jr (talk) 06:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Emigrants from Upstate New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duchess of Marlborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Upstate New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Westminster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Headless Horseman

[edit]

Hi, I saw in Hoaxes and legends of upstate New York, that you mentioned Irving's "Sleepy Hollow", and said "Irving's story was based on a German folktale, recorded by Karl Musäus, set in the Dutch culture of Post-Revolutionary War New York State." I've seen this claim made before, but without ever seeming to mention Musäus' story, and I'm trying to track it down and find reliable sources to sort out exactly what his contribution was. Do you know what the source that you used that mentioned this was? Thanks. ‑‑xensyriaT 19:11, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for this question. I was unwisely repeating a claim made in the wikipedia article about the story, not knowing that it isn't universally accepted. I have removed the claim from the "Hoaxes and Legends" page. Don Argus jr (talk) 15:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into it; it's very easily done! ‑‑xensyriaT 01:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emigrants from Upstate New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Groton, New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

[edit]
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Don Argus jr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Don Argus jr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of emigrants from Upstate New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tioga County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Don Argus jr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Don Argus jr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of emigrants from Upstate New York for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of emigrants from Upstate New York is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of emigrants from Upstate New York until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 01:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of political figures of Upstate New York is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political figures of Upstate New York until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 11:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

[edit]
US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]