User talk:Don'twasteTime

Welcome!

Hello, Don'twasteTime, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 18:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Coastline of Somalia) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Coastline of Somalia, Don'twasteTime!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Note: unless you plan to substantially expand this article, it might be best to discuss the coastline within an existing article such as Geography of Somalia. Note that Somalia#Location and habitat already discusses the length of the coast and other features. When there are multiple articles with overlapping subjects, a merger is sometimes appropriate (see WP:OVERLAP).

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 18:05, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Overpopulation in Pakistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DPLbot, I have fixed it by converting the link from African to African people. Keep me informed about such mistakes. Don'twasteTime (talk) 10:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2027 ICC Cricket World Cup

The article 2027 ICC Cricket World Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON, no actual details about it exist, only speculation for a couple of host nations

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph2302, I think details for it will begin to come within 600 days. Also added information is also sourced. Consider if we can wait until September 2019. If this article is deleted now, it will be again created within two years. Ask you feel appropriate. Don'twasteTime (talk) 01:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If details aren't coming for 2 years, then yes it's definitely too soon for an article. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph2302, redirect to Cricket World Cup is the best alternative. Don'twasteTime (talk) 10:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2027 ICC Cricket World Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2027 ICC Cricket World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 ICC Cricket World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kamir) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kamir, Don'twasteTime!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has beent agged for one issue.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Don'twasteTime (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm currently unable to edit. Editing from me has been blocked. I have been trying to do good here. I have done nothing wrong here. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

You are currently blocked because there is technical evidence connecting this account with User:Nazim Hussain Pak, and if you wish to be considered for unblock you will need to address that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.