User talk:Domperignon

Welcome!

Hello, Domperignon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

TheRingess 07:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Your User Page?

I thought I'd let you know that user:24.69.167.172, a frequent vandal, has altered your user page. I don't know if this is something that you want to revert. HistoryBA 16:53, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell what changes have been made. But thanks for the update.

Re: Bornman Article

Dom, see my comments at Talk:Erik Bornman about where to go from here, with regards to the content.

As to the issue of your email saying that the article had problems, in the future, please do not do this. Wikipedia has an extensive dispute resolution process which is where you should go to resolve content disputes with other editors. I find it somewhat disingenuous that you phrased your email as if you were an uninvolved party, or even as if you were the subject of the article himself. Libellous content in Wikipedia articles is a serious problem, which is dealt with seriously by the volunteers who respond to public emails. I find it particularly disturbing that you have done this seemingly as an experiment to test "censorship process on Wikipedia". You are forgiven this time, but in the future do not abuse the good faith of Wikipedia editors, who want nothing more than to improve the encyclopaedia. Certainly do not use well-meaning editors as the subject of experiments. The assumption of good faith is what keeps Wikipedia running, please respect this in the future. --bainer (talk) 01:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Re "Bornmann case" (AFD and Sockpuppetry)

Saw your posts during my mining-cum-restoration of the Talk:Erik Bornmann article, which was of course quickly removed by a User:Randy3. Thought you might be interested in the following:

There's more, but I thought you might like to know that "you are not alone". I just found this mess - but I've been accused of being YOU, also. ;-) Whoever you are....Skookum1 09:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]