User talk:Dommiraubi

Dommiraubi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dommiraubi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ramesh Mishra has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ramesh Mishra was changed by Dommiraubi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854668 on 2019-07-27T17:02:53+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Dommiraubi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Mohammed Zahur Khayyam did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. S0091 (talk) 18:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Sarangi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sultan Khan, Allah Rakha and Abdul Majid Khan

Sangeet Natak Akademi Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Yusuf Ali and Chitti Babu

Sarod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Abdullah Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019 #2

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pravin Godkhindi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Rupak Kulkarni. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 18:59, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please STOP deleting the automatic date templates, and also STOP adding manual ages, which will become out of date at the person's next birthday - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Jaspinder Narula. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Harald Nickel. - Arjayay (talk) 10:28, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jim Morgan (Canadian politician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 12:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sangeet Natak Akademi Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Yusuf Ali and Chitti Babu

Sarangi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sultan Khan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at J. Om Prakash, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 17:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Zanhe (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for continuing to add unsourced content despite multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 23:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[1] What's wrong with you mate?--Asqueladd (talk) 16:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Felipe Ruvalcaba

He is already listed properly under September 4. Stop readding him. --Folengo (talk) 18:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2019

Hello, when you add new days to the Deaths in 2019 page, it should not be done until the LINT timezone has passed midnight. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 10:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when you add new persons, they should be in alphabetical order under each day. --Marbe166 (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder. --Marbe166 (talk) 18:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another reminder on the alphabetical order. --Marbe166 (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Irvine

Irvine is already listed on the 6th, as per the obituary linked. Rusted AutoParts 21:08, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicolas Magriel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicolas Magriel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anant Kunte

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anant Kunte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Budaloor Krishnamurthi Shastri

Hello Dommiraubi,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dewritech and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Budaloor Krishnamurthi Shastri for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dewritech}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dewritech (talk) 20:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aguru Sarkar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aguru Sarkar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS ^💬 18:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lalbihari Bhattacharya

In Bengali source it was written that he died at the age of 81. But it does not mean that he was born in 1938.So, we can write his birth date as 1937/38. Why you are putting wrong information?--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:38, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wahid Hussain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wahid Hussain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hamid Hussain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hamid Hussain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 17:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wahid Hussain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wahid Hussain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ghulam Sabir Khan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ghulam Sabir Khan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ustad Hamid Khan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ustad Hamid Khan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagwan Das Mishra moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bhagwan Das Mishra, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:10, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Vidya Sahai Mishra

Hello, Dommiraubi,

Thank you for creating Vidya Sahai Mishra.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page cites Wikipedia. Wikipedia may not be used as a source because it is a user-generated source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Interstellarity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Interstellarity (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Siddiqui Ahmed Khan

Hello, Dommiraubi,

Thank you for creating Siddiqui Ahmed Khan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs more references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Interstellarity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Interstellarity (talk) 15:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Umrao Bundu Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umrao Bundu Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umrao Bundu Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ustad Ghulam Mohammed Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ustad Ghulam Mohammed Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ustad Ghulam Mohammed Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nabi Bakhsh Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabi Bakhsh Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabi Bakhsh Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roshan Ali Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roshan Ali Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roshan Ali Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathoo Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathoo Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathoo Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pandit Santosh Mishra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pandit Santosh Mishra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandit Santosh Mishra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghulam Nabi Shah, (Kashmir) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghulam Nabi Shah, (Kashmir) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Nabi Shah, (Kashmir) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:14, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hanuman Prasad Mishra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hanuman Prasad Mishra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanuman Prasad Mishra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghazal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghulam Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Parvez Mehdi

The article Parvez Mehdi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim as why this singer could be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 18:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R. K. Bijapure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amir Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for John Simon (critic)

On 26 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Simon (critic), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Kees08 (Talk) 07:41, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Circular reference

I am going to remove the reference/citation to the Venu article in the K. S. Gopalakrishnan article again. As I explained in my edit summary for the first revert, Wikipedia should not be used as a reference in another article. See policy guideline WP:CIRCULAR and supplement WP:WINARS. Bait30 ^Talk? 06:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at K. S. Gopalakrishnan (musician), you may be blocked from editing. Bait30 ^Talk? 21:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at B.N.Suresh. Please stop using Wikipedia as a reference. It is against policy WP:CIRCULAR Bait30 ^Talk? 17:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bait30: It appears your warning has been ignored, as Dommiraubi just created Ayiroor Sadasivan which is entirely referenced by other Wiki pages. I came here to place a warning but it looks like enough have already been given over time. Best, GPL93 (talk)

@GPL93: Thanks for bringing this to my attention! Bait30 ^Talk? 23:04, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bait30 ^Talk? 00:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dommiraubi: You're very close to being indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing. I see you are capable of making some constructive edits however. I strongly suggest you make an account of yourself and start communicating with other editors. -- œ^™ 12:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dommiraubi, I would strongly advise listening to OlEnglish and addressing the issues raised either here or at WP:ANI. I cannot find a single instance where you have used an edit summary or replied to anyone, and you have ignored warnings to cease certain behaviours multiple times now. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and communication is required. You can't just make whatever edits you want while remaining oblivious to policy, guidelines, other users, and the entire project around you. Dark Knight 2149 23:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I had to revert your edit to the Richard G. Hatcher article. Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia. Thank you-RFD (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

A. L. Raghavan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sarala

Jamuna Rani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Swarna

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of L. R. Anjali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L. R. Anjali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. R. Anjali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice December 2019

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Bait30 ^Talk? 05:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dommiraubi: Collaboration is essential at Wikipedia. Your account was created in July 2019 but you have never added a comment on a talk page. That would be fine except that other editors have raised multiple problems on this talk page, and there is a current report at the administrators' noticeboard. Please respond before continuing with any other edits. If that is not possible, you may be blocked until able to respond to the concerns raised by other editors. Johnuniq (talk) 06:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing that you never do is provide edit summaries, which I see you have been told about before. Edit summaries are essential, as they indicate to other editors what you are doing without their having to search through every edit. If you continue to edit in unconstructive or unhelpful ways you will be blocked from editing, and since an earlier short block made no impact, the block will be much longer, perhaps even indefinite. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 17:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Both Johnuniq and I have tried to encourage you to respond to concerns expressed by other editors, as can be seen above. In the week since Johnuniq asked you to respond before continuing with any other edits you have made 94 edits, and in well over 24 hours since I posted my follow up message you have made 23 edits, but you have still made no attempt to respond to messages from others, whether on this page, in the discussion on an administrators' noticeboard, or anywhere else. Unfortunately, since nothing else succeeds in getting you to take notice of messages, it is necessary to block you from editing, as both Johnuniq and I warned you would happen if you did not answer. Neither I nor anyone else wishes to prevent you from editing, and when you do respond to the concerns I hope it will be possible to unblock you so that you can continue to contribute. However, Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and editors who will not or cannot collaborate with other editors cause problems. If you are willing to start communicating with other editors, you may request an unblock block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, and then adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of this page. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 20:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anant Kunte

Hello, Dommiraubi

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Velella and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Anant Kunte, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Velella}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 05:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gopal Misra

Hello, Dommiraubi,

Thank you for creating Gopal Misra.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Gopal Misra, but note that it needs additional reliable sources, and some sort of context on how the man can be considered notable enough for a Wikipedia article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wahid Hussain concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wahid Hussain, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hamid Hussain concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hamid Hussain, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anant Kunte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anant Kunte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anant Kunte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 03:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bhagwan Das Mishra concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bhagwan Das Mishra, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Debashish Dasgupta

Hello Dommiraubi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Debashish Dasgupta for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Amkgp (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hamid Hussain

Hello, Dommiraubi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hamid Hussain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gopal Misra

The article Gopal Misra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very weak sources - one reads like a blog and the other a directory listing makes it very difficult to establish notability. Searches are unhelpful. Fails WP:GNG as it stands

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wahid Hussain

Hello, Dommiraubi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wahid Hussain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bhagwan Das Mishra

Hello, Dommiraubi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhagwan Das Mishra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Neela Ramgopal

Hello, Dommiraubi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Neela Ramgopal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 08:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ustad Hamid Khan

Hello, Dommiraubi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ustad Hamid Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ghulam Sabir Khan

Hello, Dommiraubi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ghulam Sabir Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vidya Sahai Mishra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vidya Sahai Mishra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidya Sahai Mishra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]