User talk:Domitri

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Maslow's hierarchy of needs: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.--M4gnum0n (talk) 07:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paul Mounet, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--M4gnum0n (talk) 18:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Slave breeding in the United States

Hello, regarding your RV to Slave breeding in the United States -- you see nothing wrong with that edit? The block of that user was discussed and agreed upon by myself and three other users, so I don't feel that I am in the wrong here. Please explain your opinion. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 06:16, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Well, the first article says that African Americans aren't better at athletics because of their race, even though the top ten runners are all black, clearly contradicting that. Also, it should be blacks instead of African Americans because they're not all Americans.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Domitri (talk • contribs)

The article is about the US, so anything outside is rather irrelevant.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 06:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Also, there are many sports other than running. Just because the top ten runners are black does not mean that black people are better at athletics. It is a logical fallacy. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 06:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Well I'm sure they're dominant in most sports, and it's not a stereotype. Fuck this, I'm busy, your article stinks.

"I'm sure they're dominant" is not something you can cite, it's original research. If you could find a reputable source that claims this, it could possibly be changed. However, this doesn't exist. Furthermore, please remember to be civil. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 06:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Slave breeding in the United States. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 06:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Also, on a note about grammar/spelling(since you did notate it in an edit summary), advertisement is not spelled as adversement.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 06:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Oops, I was talking about the word before advertisement, it says "and advertisement", when it should be "an advertisement"

I corrected this. Also, please sign your posts by typing ~~~~ after them. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 06:28, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

• First, please do not insult people in edit summaries. Second, the user whose edits you are defending started off by using the "n word" in multiple edit summaries. Is this really someone whose edits you want to be promoting? AniMate 06:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC)