User talk:Dominiclagan

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flight lieutentant Dominic Bruce OBE MC AFM KSG MA RAF. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Happysailor ^(Talk) 11:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flight lieutentant Dominic Bruce OBE MC AFM KSG MA RAF was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Happysailor ^(Talk) 10:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flight lieutentant Dominic Bruce OBE MC AFM KSG MA RAF concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flight lieutentant Dominic Bruce OBE MC AFM KSG MA RAF, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Flight lieutentant Dominic Bruce OBE MC AFM KSG MA RAF

Hello Dominiclagan. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Flight lieutentant Dominic Bruce OBE MC AFM KSG MA RAF.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Flight lieutentant Dominic Bruce OBE MC AFM KSG MA RAF}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Class455. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kingston College (England) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 23:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Medium sized man

Thanks for the like. I come across the guy on the Hebburn article. Btw way his nickname cracks me up. I bet the fella had some sharp wit on him...Angloyearn (talk) 15:51, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hebburn

Hello. Your recent edit to Hebburn appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, if a newspaper of record like the Times of London thinks you warrant an obituary you are 'notable'.To exclude him because of some silly bureaucratic Wike 'rule' is nonsensical, and wholly against the spirit of an online encyclopedia with pretensions to comprehensiveness. Dominiclagan (talk) 11:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Andrew Lansley, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:10, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the reliable source. Andrew told me this at dinner in Brussels last Wednesday. I checked it out and it's true. The only other person who was both the the private Secretary to a Cabinet Minister and subsequently a Cabinet Minister, was not an elected politician, he was appointed by Churchill during the war. So, he's right. Dominiclagan (talk) 07:59, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can use this link to migrate from my pen name to my actual name

https://smile.amazon.co.uk/DOMINIC-LAGAN/e/B0051UGUQ2?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1&qid=1664093757&sr=1-1 Dominiclagan (talk) 08:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Andrew Lansley, you may be blocked from editing.

Wikipedia is not interested in you are, what you "think", what you "know", what you "have been told", or even what you have "researched".
:Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in reliable, independent sources, published by a body with a reputation for fact-checking - No blogs, no self-published sources, no bodies with a conflict of interest, no promotional sites, no vanity publishers and no predatory publishers.
These sources must be properly cited, in order to support any additions to, or changes in, Wikipedia pages, so the information can be verified as true at any time in the future.
The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information, to provide references from reliable sources that support those additions or changes.
You are repeatedly failing to do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references - Arjayay (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is exactly people dislike Wiki

It run by arrogant and ignorant people who have no interest in history, just their petty power trips Dominiclagan (talk) 11:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and btw how can it be 'poorly sourced' when it came from the horse's mouth?!!!!!!!!! Dominiclagan (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into The Wooden Horse. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, let's forget it. I thought it might improve the encyclopaedia, but clearly that is not the object of Wikipedia, or its editors Dominiclagan (talk) 17:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]