User talk:Dominic Ye

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Idiom has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Idiom was changed by Dominic Ye (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929911 on 2016-03-11T23:59:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Idiom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rail transport with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC) meh[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rail transport has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tribe, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

I have reverted your recent edits here. You will be blocked if you harass other editors—please do not repeat such attacks. Regarding your user page, Wikipedia is not the correct website for requests to be left alone—other editors will revert inappropriate edits and provide advice where needed. Johnuniq (talk) 10:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 00:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dominic Ye (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I go hacked by someone and hacker sometimes changes my talk page and messages as well as my password (which I have trouble with every so and then) so I've tried to change passwords to block the person off but he breaks in no matter what I do. This happens every day and interrupts me. I only use Wikipedia and other Wiki as learning and study websites. The hacker wrote the swear words and the disruptive messages that got me blocked. Please try to understand I really didn't do it. This is why I should be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Accounts that have been hacked can not be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Declined unblock requests should not be removed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, considering that this compromised account can never be unlocked (and you did confirm again that it had been hacked in the dialog that you removed), you have no legitimate use for this talk page and so I have revoked your ability to edit it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Dominic Ye (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17198 was submitted on Dec 27, 2016 03:40:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block/Sock

For anyone reviewing this editor, and in case you hadn't realized I was just playing along with the hacking claims above, I don't believe a word of it. The block should be seen as a straight disruptive editing block, and the editor therefore not allowed to create a new "unhacked" account.

We have already had User:DominicYeet and a lame attempt to pretend that is his father - see this version of my talk page, last two sections, and DominicYeet's immediate creation of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DominicYeet (deleted - admin only). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]