User talk:Domer48/Archive 7

re: Reverting rather than reading what you are reverting

Anything look wrong there? Someone had corrected it and you restored the error. I invite you to correct it. Please be more careful and actually read the article history. --John 23:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed it. Brixton Busters 23:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both, forests and trees I'm afraid. --Domer48 08:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:1916 commemorative plague.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:1916 commemorative plague.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Sands

I fear discussion with someone who compares Christ & Sands will not be possible. If it means that much to you, leave it. Many suffragettes would also fit in the category "Criminals that committed suicide"; it is a fact not a judgment. Finally, Christ was killed. A martyr but not a suicide. Otherwise it would be a little difficult to retain suicide as a mortal sin.--MJB 14:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christ’s death was deliberate, His death, in fact was predetermined, as was His awareness of it. --Domer48 14:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MairÃ©ad Farrell.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MairÃ©ad Farrell.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Radios and detonators

I really don't see your point in changing from radio to 'detonating device' its sloppy wording and if anything using the word radio is more favourable to the Irish visitors case as the security services justification for shooting was that they claimed to have believed they carried the means to remotely set off a bomb.

In order for that there needs to be explosive, a detonating device, a radio receiver and a transmitter. Only the latter would be carried by one of the team.

In practice there was no radio, and the detonating device was with the semtex and timers in Spain. However, there is no suggestion anywhere that the security services thought they were carrying explosives. This was the PIRA, not a suicide brigade.

--Gibnews 19:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warbox

No thanks. I think I'll keep it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.64.213.101 (talk • contribs)

And it will be removed again. It is entirely inaccurate and PoV. Bastun^{BaStun not BaTsun} 11:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"talented"

Its sourced in the Tirghra reference.--Vintagekits 10:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, how would he have got on the county team if he was'ent talented. Its just play acting. --Domer48 11:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Domer48

You are fond of telling editors to look at the talk page while you are reverting, however you fail to realise that all questions that have been asked of me are answered. I am still waiting on your reply. Oh and that 'reference' is incomplete. I have asked for the full paragraph to be published however as of yet that has been avoided. If it isn't in the next few days, I will delete that reference citing the reason inaccuracy. (btw I see the WP:IRA brigade lost one of its members yesterday, I hope that won't affect your methods of reverting in numbers, its quite good fun actually trying to get answers out of some people) Regards Conypiece 12:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poison

Please specify what poisonous people I am supposed to mix with [1]. I look forward to you reply. Giano 18:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Domer was referring to the comment I had made that "any[one] outside the poisonous atmosphere Vk moved in will be amazed his behaviour was tolerated this long." He was referring to himself as being in the atmosphere, and I presume, used it to make a point that he feels the comment was aimed at him.

The meaning of that comment was to indicate that the baseline behaviour of the protangonists in the running battles between some British and Irish editors is terrible. Because it has been going on so long, and the divisions run so deep, that behaviour that would not be tolerated elsewhere in the project is pretty much the norm. This is the "poisonous atmosphere" I referred to, and it was not meant to reflect on any single editor, or even any "side", just the whole damn situation. Rockpocket 18:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am foreighn, I notta understand these double negatives and "" thingies! Giano 18:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IRA

Hello Domer. I'm happy to confirm that the WP:IRA has nothing to do with you. What actually happened was Erin Go Bragh (talk · contribs) created a IRA Wikiproject and created WP:IRA as a shortcut. This was merged with the Irish republicanism wikiproject, and the shortcut was merged too. I'm assuming this was done in good faith, but I don't this its a smart idea to use that link for the republicanism project (for what I hope are obvious reasons). Anyway, I have removed the link from the project page, and nominated it for deletion (see here) if you wish to comment. Rockpocket 20:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Real Irish Republican Army

Please stop removing the fact they are a terrorist organisation, it is not my POV or Weasel Words, it is a fact that has been defined by other organisations, and they are listed in List of designated terrorist organizations. Danielnez1 12:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But not in the 26 counties! --Domer48 19:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong! Bastun^{BaStun not BaTsun} 19:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not that this had anything to do with ye, make your point with ref's--Domer48 20:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Won't be here for long, but I'll do the odd bit while I'm waiting to see if anything happens with the current situation. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 14:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom case

User:SqueakBox has filed Wikipedia:Request for arbitration#User:Vintagekits and you are a mentioned party. Kittybrewster (talk) 21:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry West

Even though you seem to be trying your hardest to look after padraig, you have to remember past discussions, see Template Talk:1981 Hunger Strike. Conypiece 22:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Escape

There you go. Make sure you keep an eye on it when I'm gone too please. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 22:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles opened

Hello. The above named arbitration case, in which you were named as a party, has opened. Please submit your evidence directly on the case page, or, if needed, submit it via email to an arbitrator or an arbitration clerk.

For the Arbitration clerk committee,
- Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 11:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not list someone else on an open arbitration case unless you have their approval. Subsequent listing on open arbitration case is generally restricted to Arbitrators. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 18:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]