User talk:Domenic Pennetta
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, Domenic Pennetta, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Paleosphaeronites moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Paleosphaeronites, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 18:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Paleosphaeronites
[edit]
Hello, Domenic Pennetta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paleosphaeronites, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Nice works!
[edit]Excellent reconstruction for Balhuticaris and Ercaicunia! However, I think it is good to review this in Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Paleoart review as well. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment! I was not aware of of the Paleoart review page (at first glance, it looks very helpful). I do my best to create reconstructions from the published literature (i.e. peer-reviewed journals) from paleontologists. If there is not good information on a specific specimen, then I hold off from reconstructing it. However, I would very much love others to look over my work and assist me in making more accurate illustrations! Do you recommend I start posting images onto the review page before adding them to articles? Domenic Pennetta (talk) 15:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah I recommend that. As I see, segment numbers of Balhuticaris looks like decreased, of course it is so hard to get over 100 segments though... Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, it was an artistic liberty on my part—which I understand makes the image not as accurate as it could be. Perhaps I can augment the drawing to suggest more segmentation toward the posterior of the animal? Domenic Pennetta (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- I think narrower segmentation is best to show that, but I am not sure, so I recommend to ask it in paleoart review. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ok so I will post them on paleoart review, and I will ping you when done. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 09:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- I think narrower segmentation is best to show that, but I am not sure, so I recommend to ask it in paleoart review. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 16:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, it was an artistic liberty on my part—which I understand makes the image not as accurate as it could be. Perhaps I can augment the drawing to suggest more segmentation toward the posterior of the animal? Domenic Pennetta (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah I recommend that. As I see, segment numbers of Balhuticaris looks like decreased, of course it is so hard to get over 100 segments though... Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)