User talk:DollyMemorial

DollyMemorial, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DollyMemorial! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Main Page (2015 redesign). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. samtar ^{t} 18:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Im Warned you. Your Edits are been reverted by Bonadea.

Its got Reverted because To use a encyclopedia added a space after the pipe. its the wrong one! you will redirect to Special:Statistics| instand for Special:Statistics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chazpelo (talk • contribs) 17:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. i rewarning you because you do a reverting war. if you get banned. you can't join the Teahouse. your edits are good faith and extremly disrupive. you dont know about TW. its mean Twinkle. your edit are reverted because the formatting. "That wording is intentional" Chazpelo (talk) 21:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mint 3D for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mint 3D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mint 3D until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam9007 (talk) 01:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]