Jump to content

User talk:Doksuri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Doksuri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 02:31, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, No problem. Just remember to SIGN your posts! I saw you make a good effort on your first page and gave you a welcome note. Have a great time editing Wikipedia! --Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 18:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Korea!

[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Korea-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Korea? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Korea-related articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Caspian blue 23:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Annals of the Joseon Dynasty

[edit]

Let the romanization issue be settled: I read about the McCune-Reischauer, including the Wikipedia article which has link to the 1939 paper you cited, and found I was wrong. While I was searching for more, I encountered Korean McCune-Reischauer Romanization Dictionary to which many professionals, including one who works at Library of Congress, contribute. Since this site provides the exact answer needed, I cited it as a primary reference. And because I thought the majority of your citations are inappropriate as primary sources (since it seems to me that you only wanted to refer to the titles, not contents) so I removed them. I also removed the 1939 paper because it is part of the McCune-Reischauer article, which is only one click away. Lifeweaver (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]