User talk:Dokientrung

Welcome!

Hello Dokientrung, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Tim 1357 ^talk 18:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Order of Independence, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Order of Independence was changed by Dokientrung (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-12-22T18:23:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help!

Your contributed article, Independence Order

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Independence Order. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Order of Independence. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Order of Independence - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. EricSerge (talk) 19:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for the same time, and the same reason, as your other account Prince Sophia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

phù hiệu QĐNDVN

Chào bạn, phù hiệu bạn làm tuyệt lắm, cố gắng nha bạn. À hình như Bộ đội Biên phòng Việt Nam chưa có biểu tượng thì phải. Trần Ái Quốc (talk) 08:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

cái roundel của biên phòng VN nhìn lạ nhỉ, mình chưa thấy bao giờ. Mình có cái emblem của Biên phòng Vn nhưng ko bik là sao upload lên wiki common 1 cách hợp lệ Trần Ái Quốc (talk) 13:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

kpop industry section

I understand what you are trying to say, but if you look at the source i provided, it tells that the ranking is based on TOTAL MUSIC REVENUE, which includes BOTH digital and physical market. In South Korea, as well as in most of the world, physical music market is dying out and is rapidly replaced by digital market. Digital market now takes up up to about 60 % of the market, so if you only talk about physical market, you are basically explaining only half piece of the Korean music industry, instead of the whole. Another, the diagram you provided was made back in 2006,, that's 8 years ago.. Lastly, I do not know the reason why American market as well as Japanese market has to be even mentioned in this article,, Think about it, would you put a section about K-pop industry in American music industry article?--Junilein (talk) 10:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My answer

Firstly, you should read "Music indutry" page in Wikipedia [[1]]. It's talking all thing about global music industry nowadays. That image include South Korea music (in right corner), and I upload it cause I want to talk more detail about South Korea music.

Secondly, the 24th rankings of South Korea is based on Global music industry market share data with clearly data in [[2]]. If you read this page, you'll understand that "The Global music industry rankings based on retail value (rather than units) each market generates respectively per year". It's NOT BASED ON Digital music.

Thirdly, your writings are too much praise about K-pop, it violates with the required neutral information on Wikipedia. Your should respect all clearly and neutral information about K-pop.

Reply

Before, anything, please sign your comments by adding four tides (Junilein (talk) 11:19, 31 March 2012 (UTC)), it's just the rule in Wikipedia. I do not have any intention to praise, I created the criticism section in K-pop, and when I put information, I try to make it as neutral as possible. I do not oppose for any information getting deleted that's biased in the article, even if it's written by me.[reply]

Those sources you provided, once again, only represent the physical market. Look at the heading columns: singles, albums, DVD, Casettes.. And what about this source? [[3]] (thats a 09' data,,, still far differ from RIAJ data you provided)Junilein (talk) 11:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Reply

Okay, you have your source and me too. So, what's now? Should we upload 2 sources and 2 rankings in this page? Dokientrung 11:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

solution

We can split the article into two sections: one for digital, other for physical.Junilein (talk) 11:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea

Okay, that's good idea. Dokientrung 18:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vua VN

Chào bạn, nếu không phiền nhờ bạn dịch nốt các bài về một số vị vua Việt Nam còn thiếu sang tiếng Anh. List of Vietnamese monarchs. Hiện các vua Triều/Hàn có bài tiếng Anh hết, không lẽ vua Việt Nam không bằng. 113.168.103.63 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tuyệt vời

Ý kiến bạn rất hay, tôi sẽ thu xếp thời gian và sẽ dịch trước một số vua quan trọng của nước ta. Thân ái (talk) 13:20, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Vietnam People's Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zvezda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

weightlifting records

prior to updating please read the section note which reads "Prior to this competition..." The place for new records is the list of records pageLihaas (talk) 17:07, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ảnh trên Flick

Rất vui được biết bạn, mình muốn hỏi bạn là Dokientrung trên Flick có phải là bạn không nhỉ, nếu phải thì các ảnh về Trường Sa trên đó có phải do bạn sở hữu không, vì mình thấy chúng xuất hiện tại một số tờ báo khác. Cảm ơn--Minhminh284 20:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minhminh284 (talk • contribs)

LICH SUR SUR DOAN BO BINH 5

Hello, I wonder if you have this book. I want to edit the Vietnamese page dealing with the Battle of Long Tan that took place on 18 August 1966. I want to include the names of the 30 Vietnamese soldiers killed fighting the Australians in this battle. Can you help obtain the names of these 30 Martyrs. Also, can you help me buy the book LICH SUR SUR DOAN BO BINH 5?--Lookupthenumber (talk) 05:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

about your edition in this February, 2015 (nobel prize winners of China)

Your edtion of nobel laureates in China which you did in this February was wrong. You deleted the name of Dr. Chenning Yang and Dr. Tsungdao Lee (both Nobel Laureates in Physics) from the list of China, maybe for both Doctors already having the citizenship of the USA. However, for example, 2 Japanese Nobel Laureates in Physics, Dr. Shuji Nakamura, and Dr. Yoichiro Nambu are listed in the Nobel Laureates in Japan, while they already have the citizenship of the USA now (actually their nationality is also already the USA). So is Dr. Ramakrishnan and Dr. Chandrasekhar, both born in India and they are also listed in the Nobel Laureates of India while their citizenship and nationality are already Britain and the USA. Then there is no problem on listing these scientists in the Nobel Laureates lists of Japan and India. However, to be fair and equal with the Japanese and Indian scientists above, we also need to list Dr. Lee and Dr. Yang as the Nobel Laureates of China as well, even they already have the citizenship of the USA because they were also born in China and they graduated from a university in China, the current Nankai University in Tianjin, while they went to the USA after graduating the university in China, which is the same course as many Japanese and many Indian doctors were going. I can guess the reason you deleted the name of these 2 Chinese scientists from the list of China. You did it just because of your hostile sentiment against China for sea territory issue because you are Vietnamese (as written in your introduction), isn't it ? I personally think that Vietnam should be defended for the sea territory issue, for sure. I really think the sea territory should belong to Vietnam, for sure. However, your sentiment should be seperated from the fair rule and equality of the official record of Nobel Laureates, as I wrote above. For example, there is one Vietnamese Fields Medal winner, Dr.Ngo Bao Chau. He already has citizenship (and maybe nationality as well) of France, while he is listed in the Fields Medal winner of Vietnam, which I have no prolem and believe should be recognized by the public in this way. Then it is the same for Chinese, Indian, Japanese, or any people from any country. I hope you kindly understand my proposal which I strongly believe is fair. MESSAGE FROM TOKYO JAPAN. 10:53, 23 February 2015 (Japanese local time)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]