User talk:Dojarca/Archive2

Nazi occupation of the Baltics

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nazi occupation of the Baltics, by DLX (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nazi occupation of the Baltics fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Copy of Occupation_of_Baltic_states#Nazi_occupation.2C_1941-1944, created against consensus.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nazi occupation of the Baltics, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Nazi occupation of the Baltics itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Occupation of Baltic states. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. DLX 09:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

You have been engaged in an edit war in violation of the three-revert rule. As you did stop reverting after being warned, I am choosing this time to warn you that such conduct will result in a block from editing. Please be careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than reverting repeatedly. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Occupation of Baltic republics by Nazi Germany

Thanks for creating Occupation of Baltic republics by Nazi Germany. It may not have been a good idea to list your own article for WP:AfD. What you should have done, is contested the speedy delete with a {{hangon}} template, and asked some other user to look at the situation. It is evident, that the article did not meet the WP:SPEEDY criteria.

You could also consider withdrawing your AfD proposal. This is in fact what I suggest you do. -- Petri Krohn 21:31, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Moscow

A-Class articles should have all at least attained Good article status. Moscow has not attained that status yet. Dr. Cash 05:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Lodztelephone.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lodztelephone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leo the Wise and the end of Consular Dating

Since neither you nor Joe Kress look like you are going to pursue this interesting issue, I am researching it a little and drafting up something for WP. However, I am unable to substantiate your comment on Leo the Wise. Unfortunately, I do not read Russian. I would be grateful if you could give me an English translation of the passage in the book you refer to that discusses this point, as well as the English title and the author of the book, and, most particularly, the primary source of the information.

Thanks, --Chris Bennett 20:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Digging a little deeper, I am assuming this is based onn Leo VI's Basilica, althouhg I haven't found an explicit statement to that effect. I have added some text based on your input and that of Joe Kress about this topic. Take a look and adjust as you see fit --Chris Bennett 22:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move of football (soccer)

Please do not move pages without consensus. Various titles for the page have been discussed at length, and football (soccer) is the consensus title. See the discussions at Talk:Football (soccer) and its archives. Oldelpaso 16:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab Case

In my opinion and of hearing the case, I believe that the POV tag should be added to the article until all parties can reach an agreement. If you do not agree with this decision you may request another medcab case or get a third opinion. If you find it necessary, you could request a real mediation case. Jac_roe^Blank 18:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren

I have reverted the change you have made to the Digwuren Arbitration proposed decision page. This page should only be edited by Arbitrators. However, I invite you to contribute this proposal to the Workshop. Cbrown1023 talk 00:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Occupation of Baltic states

You must iterate what your issues are on the article talk page, as the tag states, otherwise it will be removed. Martintg 07:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reasins indicated here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Occupation_of_Baltic_states#Occupation_of_Baltic_states and in the meditation case.--Dojarca 07:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The tag refers to talk page, I see no new talk since July. The tag was newly placed today without any discussion on talk. Pointing vaguely to a closed mediation case and refusing articulate the issues on the talk pages when requested indcates this may be WP:POINT Martintg 08:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The prevous issue unfortunately has not been resolved :-( so all the presented reasons still valid.--Dojarca 09:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you again apply the tag without any further discussion on the talk page. Do you even know what these previous issues are? You seem to be having difficulty specifying them. This is very disruptive as we cannot read your mind, and thus stops the improvement of the article. It is your intent to disrupt or improve this article? Martintg 09:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can read all the issues here: [1] and in the archive. I don't understand why do you experience difficulties with it. --Dojarca 09:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advise

Dojarca, I think you need to calm down a little. Actually, not a little but a lot. Here is a simple trick. Before replying to a talk page entry that angered you, give it a couple of hours not to. Such messages can always wait even much longer. Same applies to reverts. Mother Russia won't collapse from some Wikipedia's article's being at the version which seems "wrong" to you for some extended time. --Irpen 16:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mk-dos.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mk-dos.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 06:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]