User talk:Doherty93
January 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm R Prazeres. I noticed that you recently removed content from Masjid al-Qiblatayn (Somaliland) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. R Prazeres (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- The source literally talks about when the mosque was built. The mosque has its name for a reason. It’s not just made up. Weird to deny the truth. The whole city has been identified with Avalites by scholars. You are lying about the sources. Did you even read it? Doherty93 (talk) 12:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Egyptians became Muslim by conquest, not Somalis. The mosque itself wouldn’t have two qiblas otherwise if it wasn’t built before any mosque in Egypt. That’s a known fact. Doherty93 (talk) 12:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- The claim at issue is the date of the mosque's construction, not wider Somali or Egyptian history. Stop removing the maintenance template, stop adding sources that don't verify the actual statement, and please discuss on the talk page where I've already explained the issue. Wikipedia is edited by consensus, not by edit-warring. If you continue removing the maintenance template without reaching a consensus on the talk page, this may be grounds to report you to administrators. R Prazeres (talk) 17:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Egyptians became Muslim by conquest, not Somalis. The mosque itself wouldn’t have two qiblas otherwise if it wasn’t built before any mosque in Egypt. That’s a known fact. Doherty93 (talk) 12:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of Somalia into Proto-Somali. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)