User talk:Dogville

Nice trimming of the BNP Christmas Party incident. Paulleake 01:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Dogville 13:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop adding {{citeneeded}} to every single fact? We really don't need this kind of defensive editing. Unless it's a particularly controversial or disputed fact, citations can be quite obstructive to the flow of the article. David | Talk 12:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're obviously personal acquaintances with Tatchell. The line on his work as a schoolkid sounds like original research to me. As you're being so strict about other people doing it, I think it would help if you cited your sources on things like that. Similarly, perhaps we could avoid language like "rid the world of babies". But I've made my point and will try to add it less. Dogville 12:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The story of Peter Tatchell's activities while at Mount Waverley was published as long ago as 1983 in "The Battle for Bermondsey". David | Talk 12:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BNP Page

Another well done on your research into the BNP's list of labour/tory wrong-doers, I'm very impressed! Now if you could just pop down to Barking and maybe have a word with a few of the voters there.... --Robdurbar 22:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Always easier to do that kind of thing when it's a distraction from real work you should be doing instead ... Dogville 22:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

anonymous

Don't be so obsessed with the BNP and other loyal Patriotic Socialists. There's nothing you can do to stop the rise of common sense. The British are a proud people who've had enough of political correctness and cow-towing to the whims of minorities. Put that good brain of yours to good use and join us. Don't fight it - tomorrow belongs to us, not them. When the common sense majority verdict of the jury in Nick Griffin's second show trial comes in this month you will again see Labour humiliated and British common sense vindicated. Give in to what you know is right. Join us. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.71 (talk • contribs)

Cute. I'm going for "this is a very good pastiche", but I suppose it could be genuine. So either well done, or don't be silly. Dogville 09:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Griffin

Aha, thanks! Seems fitting considering BNP party policy is that "homosexuals should stay in the closet where they belong" or some such crap. You know what they say about homophobes! Zythe 12:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: [My] recent reversion to [your] user talk page

Hi, Dogville. Sorry, I was out of line. The warning (which I've removed) looked legitimate to me, so by Wikipedia:Removing warnings#Vandalism I thought it inappropriate for you to remove it. However, as per Help:Talk page, "reverting such removals or redirects is not proper and may result in a block for edit warring." I apologize for the confusion. In the future, a quick note in the edit summary might help. =) Powers 13:08, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Great White Records

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Great White Records, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ChaoticReality 12:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Socialist White People's Party (Harold Covington)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article National Socialist White People's Party (Harold Covington), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:ORG; single line stub without references to reliable sources

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Skomorokh 16:12, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Civil Liberty (UK)

I have nominated Civil Liberty (UK), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civil Liberty (UK). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sceptre ^(talk) 09:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]