User talk:Dogs on wheelz

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dogs on wheelz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't even made any edits, and am not a sock of anyone. This is a totally unjustified block. Dogs on wheelz (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"... On wheelz". I have not heard that name for many years. Perhaps it alone is enough for the block. Nevertheless I'm not unblocking because of the paucity of the edits making it near-impossible to determine whether this account isn't related to the sockmaster. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dogs on wheelz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If my username is really that inappropriate/unacceptable, I can request to change it if you admins request it. However, this is my only account and I'm not a sock. If you say "it near-impossible to determine whether this account isn't related to the sockmaster", then it would also be near-impossible to determine whether this account IS related to the sockmaster, and I'm innocent until proven guilty. Dogs on wheelz (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed your account as related to Safwwefe. Coupled with the username, I think it is safe to say you two are the same. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dogs on wheelz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Checkuser proves nothing since multiple people could be using the same IP address (e.g., in a library). How does my username have anything to do with being a sock of another person? I am not a sock of anyone, and have been unfairly blocked! Dogs on wheelz (talk) 23:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

your choice of username and the checkuser evidence, together with your obvious familiarity with the project, makes this a safe decision. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser proves nothing since multiple people could be using the same IP address

Just so you know, CheckUser shows more than just IP addresses. Ginsuloft (talk) 12:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]