User talk:Dogfiveshield

July 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to History of propaganda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:29, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits to the taxonomy templates. Continuing to disrupt the taxonomy templates may lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. A.R.M. 14:52, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dogfiveshield! Thank you for your contributions. I am Seraphim System and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Seraphim System ^(talk) 14:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda

Since you have had warnings above, I think it would be a good idea to start using edit summaries to justify your removals. If it's disputed, starting a discussion on the article talk page to discuss the reasons for the removal or possible improvements to the content might be a good idea. Seraphim System ^(talk) 14:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Icewhiz (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ARBPIA general prohibition

Please note that WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 may apply to some of your edits:

2) All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition is preferably enforced by the use of extended confirmed protection, but where that is not feasible, it may also be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.

Best regards. Icewhiz (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]