User talk:Doge2048

Doge2048, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Doge2048! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

York and North Midland Railway vs. York, Newcastle and Berwick Railway

Please refer to the map accompanying the Thirsk and Malton Line article: the assertion that the York and North Midland Railway formed the present East Coast Main Line at Pilmoor would appear to be erroneous. The junction is clearly with the York, Newcastle and Berwick Railway. Bristolre (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bristolre: Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to be more careful there. --Doge2048 (talk) 20:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Doge2048 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a constructive contributor. I would like to stick to making minor edits such as spelling, punctuation and the like. --Doge2048 (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 12:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Doge2048 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you think I am abusing multiple accounts, please tell me who my sockmaster is. The block message only says "Abusing multiple accounts". --Doge2048 (talk) 02:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC) (P.S.) Please don't revoke my talk page access because I need to know all about the investigation here.)[reply]

Decline reason:

As already noted, you are SlitherioFan2016 (talk · contribs). Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 11:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.