User talk:Doctorpsb

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jack_Greenmaven Being a doctor doesn't mean that one can't contribute in the other fields. All my edits are based an facts and I've cited source in almost every place. but on what ground you are calling my edit of Gracilis muscle vandalism. Now I'm pretty sure that you are not a doctor or health care professional, but I'm sure that you have powerful computers all around you, as you are a "wikipedia admin"! . Custodian of virginity is a well recognized nick name for the Gracilis muscle.You should check the accuracy of technical facts before using blanket terms like "vandalism" , "disruptive editing" etc.

December 2013

Hello, I'm Flat Out. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Adam Gilchrist, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muttiah Muralitharan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:39, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Riya Sen, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Riya Sen was changed by Doctorpsb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855863 on 2013-12-20T01:45:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mark Nicholas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in Nagpur , after watching Dil To Pagal Hai he reportedly "fell in love " with Madhuri Dixit. (http://www.outlookindia.com/glitterati.aspx?114

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gracilis muscle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Greenmaven (talk) 03:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mika Singh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Greenmaven (talk) 03:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly libellous edits

You are adding 'controversies' to a number of living persons. --Greenmaven (talk) 03:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Nicholas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Greenmaven (talk) 03:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Stuart Binny has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stuart Binny was changed by Doctorpsb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858679 on 2013-12-22T17:35:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Parsons. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jim Parsons was changed by Doctorpsb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941875 on 2013-12-23T10:42:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:42, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gracilis muscle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Greenmaven (talk) 05:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spencer^T♦C 07:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]