User talk:Doctor Hesselius

Welcome!

Hello, Doctor Hesselius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --玉米^ō^麦兜 18:28, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Hippy?

Hello Doc H,

Do I know you? Why did you write that I was a Hippie Wikipedian? Also, it is supposed to be spelled Hippie, not Hippy. I dont know if I still qualify as being a hippie, anymore. My hair is very short, I never wear bell bottoms denims or tie dye t shirts. (I wish I could buy them!} When Bush invaded Iraq, I thought it was a good thing. I think Iraq is worth 60,000 US Troops killed. I am more Conservative than Liberal.

Thanx from the Bronx

Supercool Dude 19:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hippy is an alternative spelling for Hippie....I prefer it. ;-) I know everybody. Or more, likely, I took a little too much perscription tablets when I added you! - Hesselius.

Your RFA

Hey Doc, I just thought you ought to know that your RFA is malformed and will be picked up by a lot of other editors as a sign of inexperience. Can I advise that you withdraw your application and read up on Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship? It may also be useful to know that, in general, applicants with your level of experience are usually encouraged to withdraw to gain more before reapplying. However, I naturally respect your application and wish you all the best. The Rambling Man 12:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rambling Man. I will do as you advise. DR. Martin Hesselius 12:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Invitation to vote

You as someone who participated in the editing of English people article might be interested in taking part in this discussion. Feel free to state your opinion. M.V.E.i. 16:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1894–95 World Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1894–95 World Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1894–95 World Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sunderland against Di Canio (talk) 12:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]