User talk:Doctofunk

Image Tagging for Image:Glebova.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Glebova.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 02:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of Survivor & Original Research

I hope you realize what you are doing to my watchlist. ;) --Maxamegalon2000 19:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I believe it was reverted because your tagging all the Elimination Vote sections for Original Research was a little too broad. While there may be sections that might have NPOV problems, I wouldn't call it Original Research. The Elimination Vote sections generally describe the reasons as presented on the show and the episodes do a fairly good job of showing why somebody was voted out. If you have issues with certain summaries, you should tag and/or fix them. But I think tagging everything Original Research was a bit much. -- Gogo Dodo 04:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Way Entertainment.

Just repaired this article you nominated for deletion, you forgot the dot! :O It's over here now (with a dot).--Andeh 19:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Juggernaut Bitch!!

An editor has nominated The Juggernaut Bitch!!, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Juggernaut Bitch!! and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sherron Rolax

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sherron Rolax, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherron Rolax. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Thunderbunny (talk) 03:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]