User talk:Docsholiday
Welcome
[edit]
|
How do I block a user for a page. Palmetto cheese Wikipedia page keeps getting stuff added to it that doesn’t pertain to cheese. Docsholiday (talk) 03:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Edit warring at Palmetto Cheese
[edit]Hello Docsholiday. Please be aware of a report at the edit warring noticeboard about this article. It's possible you thought you were reverting vandalism there, but please be cautious about going past WP:3RR. You risk being sanctioned yourself! Instead of continuing to revert, it is best to report the problem to administrators. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:49, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank u and I apologize for this. The page as it is right now is correct. The one user, who I think has been blocked for 48h, along with others are intending to purposeful discredit the owner. I was literally deleting their edit that they were copying and then posting again and again. I have asked the owners social media team if their is a way to protect the site at least for a period of time until this maybe goes away. I don’t know Wikipedia policies very well but I assume international and blatant attempts to discredit the owner is not one of the. Thank u and I apologize. Docsholiday (talk) 12:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Do you have a conflict of interest?
[edit]
Hello Docsholiday. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Docsholiday. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Docsholiday|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- I am not a paid by palmetto cheese at all. I do not work for palmetto cheese and have zero paid affiliation with palmetto cheese. I would have disclosed that in creating my wiki username. I do however know the owner(s) of this company. The only reason to add such negative edits is to attempt to discredit a very good individual and company. 11-12 days ago when the page was protected from edit warring, which I didn’t even know existed, the comments were similar in nature. Please advise. Thank you. Docsholiday (talk) 06:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- The page was protected to stop the continuous back and forth editing. It has no bearing on what content the article should contain. If information is reliably sourced and verifiable then it belongs here and your claim that the reason to include it "is to discredit a very good individual and company" is groundless. Your continued removal of sourced content is disruptive. SmartSE (talk) 08:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)