User talk:Docmo
Welcome!
Hello, Docmo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Kusma (討論) 15:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Paul Wolff Metternich
[edit]Thank you for contributing this stub! I have announced it at the Germany announcement page. If you create more Germany-related articles, please list them there so other editors interested in Germany can find them. You might also be interested in the Germany project. Unfortunately your article does not cite any references - could you provide some so it can be verified? Thank you, and happy editing, Kusma (討論) 15:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Prof. Westerfield
[edit]I had a quick question about the German version of the article about Yale Professor H. Bradford Westerfield.
I just wondered why you omitted George W. Bush and Dick Cheney from brief list of well-known students whose later views were influenced by this compelling lecturer? The inclusion of these names would not seem to be controversial -- certainly not inaccurate; but there may have been other factors in your decision-making? --Ooperhoofd (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- I does't change anything... ?? --Docmo (talk) 11:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of ENBau
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ENBau, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Sandstein 22:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed new policy
[edit]As a recent contributor to Deaths in 2009, you may be able to help decide on a proposed new policy. It is proposed that:
- A month should be deleted from the "Deaths in [CURRENT YEAR]" page ONE WEEK after the month ends.
Please opine at Talk:Deaths_in_2009#Proposed new policy. Don't just say
- Support.
or
- Oppose.
Also state your reasons and participate in the discussion. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Michael R. Buchmeiser
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michael R. Buchmeiser, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Research chemist with a PhD. No evidence of notability.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 22:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Docmo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 56 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Jean-Marie Basset - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- John E. Bercaw - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Siegried Blechert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Volker Oppitz (scientist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of List of officers and commanders in the Battle of Stalingrad for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of officers and commanders in the Battle of Stalingrad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of officers and commanders in the Battle of Stalingrad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EyeSerenetalk 08:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Clemens August Andreae
[edit]Hi! Do you know if there are English sources that discuss de:Clemens August Andreae? I would like for an article on Clemens August Andreae to be made on here. Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 06:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know. I haven't the faintest idea.--Docmo (talk) 06:37, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, ok. The listing of works in the German article... is that a listing of Andreae's works? WhisperToMe (talk) 09:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Yiip. Have also a look to VIAF. --Docmo (talk) 20:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you! I started the English article on him at Clemens August Andreae WhisperToMe (talk) 06:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thx. for the action ! --Docmo (talk) 08:46, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you! I started the English article on him at Clemens August Andreae WhisperToMe (talk) 06:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yiip. Have also a look to VIAF. --Docmo (talk) 20:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, ok. The listing of works in the German article... is that a listing of Andreae's works? WhisperToMe (talk) 09:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Docmo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Paolo Piva moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Paolo Piva, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 10:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paolo Piva has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Ways to improve Hans-Peter Fischer
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. Docmo, thanks for creating Hans-Peter Fischer!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing more references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 17:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Docmo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Bruno Schroder
[edit]I see that you have moved this article from "Bruno Schroder" to "Bruno Lionel Schroder", over the redirect. As far as I can determine, he is always referred to as "Bruno Schroder". Per WP:MIDDLENAME, "Generally, use the most common format of a name used in reliable sources", I can see no basis for not preferring "Bruno Schroder" as the article name. I have raised this at Talk:Bruno Lionel Schroder, so please respond there. Edwardx (talk) 20:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Docmo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Docmo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Friedrich Berentzen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:38, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2020
[edit]Your addition to The Assembly of the Catholic Ordinaries of the Holy Land has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)