User talk:Docket42

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Docket42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Talk:The Law Offices of Sam Bernstein. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?

I find your almost-singular interest in adding material about just two individuals, and the exhaustive volume of that information ... unusual. Do you have a personal or professional relationship to Susan Martin and/or Richard H. Bernstein? -Jason A. Quest (talk) 01:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather go in depth on a subject than just engage in surface edits on several subjects, and I'm from Michigan so you hear these names a lot here.--Docket42 (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I live in Michigan too. I don't hear these two names that much. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 12:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, much of the information you're adding to these two articles isn't actually about the subjects of those articles. Writing about everything that happened at EMU under the tenure of Martin, or writing in detail about the cases that Bernstein was involved in, doesn't belong in articles about those people. Martin is not EMU. Bernstein is not his clients. Someone is going to have to go through these two books you're writing and trim them down into encyclopedia articles. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 12:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel my contributions aren't helpful to the community.--Docket42 (talk) 13:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry enough to cut it out? -Jason A. Quest (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Sam Bernstein Law Firm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sam Bernstein Law Firm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sam Bernstein Law Firm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 09:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]